eddyis2live on Sidechat | Would you rather option 1. Have an engagement ring and wedding band of unlimited budget but no wedding ceremony or Option 2. Have a wedding ceremony with an unlimited budget but extremely cheap engagement ring and wedding band (both under $300)

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Ask Women 1d

eddyis2live

Would you rather option 1. Have an engagement ring and wedding band of unlimited budget but no wedding ceremony or Option 2. Have a wedding ceremony with an unlimited budget but extremely cheap engagement ring and wedding band (both under $300)

#poll

Option 1

Option 2

117 votes

Anonymous 1d

who cares about the huge party its the marriage that you're celebrating and putting work into. my bf and i are doing a small ceremony in a national park

🍓

Anonymous 1d

There are very pretty wedding rings for under 300 dollars. What matters is putting in effort and care.

Anonymous 1d

Rather a cheap ring and save for a big wedding. I can always upgrade the ring at any time

Anonymous 1d

neither please

Anonymous 1d

Where’s the real best option: neither, have a small ceremony, cheaper ring, and put the extra towards a down payment for a house! This is what I actually want!

Anonymous 1d

What about the reception

Anonymous 1d

Personally, I just wanna splurge on the honeymoon

Anonymous

#2 1d

And I’m not a ring person so I’d feel bad if he bought a very expensive ring for me to not wear it unless we’re in public and then I fidget with my rings too much

Anonymous

#5 1d

The ceremony is like 30 minutes

Anonymous

#2 21h

See I even think this is a waste of money. A “big wedding” is literally just putting on a show for family and friends. It has nothing to do with the couple. I say, save that money and put it towards a house! That way you’ll be setting yourself up for success and stability rather than splurging thousands on 1 night.