Anonymous #2 49w

the diff between the length of your arms and legs are very noticeable actually and the lack of ability to run too sooooo

18

Anonymous #5 49w

You can run with leg lengthening after a year more over when would you need to run while dating for it to even come up? Also you could just say it’s for a different reason. Arms and torso isn’t is only noticeable when doing the surgery twice to gain 6 inches

-1

Anonymous #2 49w

*is only noticeable

-1

Anonymous #2 49w

nah the dudes who get it look disproportionate and super unathletic— no one is more hard on a short guy than a short guy.

6

Anonymous #12 49w

If you think three inches is going to be visually obvious irl just speaking to a person and you’re going to have an opportunity to visually measure the ratios you are just overestimating reality. Also the athletic thing isn’t true there’s literally a dude who runs marathons and did it twice lmao

-1

Comment Deleted

0

It’s the equivalent of for the reasons people list. It’s also their choice. I’m not going to encourage someone to get it. I’m also not going to judge one for getting it either.

-2

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

Hey. To each their own. Y’all still sound like those dudes who get up in arms about women getting any form of plastic surgery.

-2

That sucks. I’m sorry you’ve gone through that. It does sound like hell. I’m just sure there are people with deviated septum that’d say the same about nose jobs.

2

Comment Deleted

0

I can. And I am. Cause you’re still drawing unfair conclusions about a person’s mental health over their desire to change their appearance and the lengths they’re willing to go through.

0

Comment Deleted

0

Bones also get cracked during facial reconstruction surgery? And you aren’t refusing to date someone over these negative outcomes though; you’re refusing to bc you think that someone who does it is insecure and mentally unwell. It’s the exact argument used against anyone that gets any form of gender affirmation/body mod.

0

Comment Deleted

0

I can dislike the dangers associated with the surgery while also not prematurely judging those who get it as unfit to date me.

0

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #13 49w

i wouldn’t date a guy who got plastic surgery either

3

Cool. You do you. You just used the same series of arguments I’ve heard against other reconstructive/gender affirming surgeries, only with a harsher degree of severity. Make your peace with that.

3

Comment Deleted

0

You read the part where I said “with a harsher degree of severity”? Christ, stop getting so defensive. Just say it with ya chest.

0

Anonymous twirling_tornado 49w

Lil shallow if you asked me but I’m sure you have the same opinion of those who get PS.

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #13 49w

Facial reconstruction surgery is usually done to fix birth defects or correct issues caused by trauma💀 the “bone cracking” done in aesthetic surgeries like rhinoplasty is actually very small precise cuts. This is completely different to limb lengthening surgery where the bone is completely cut into two separate pieces, hence why it takes multiple MONTHS to heal from it. I haven’t had a rhinoplasty but I have had a septoplasty which is similar and the healing time is two weeks. Not comparable.

4

We’re talking about your willingness to date someone who’s gotten a procedure, not the procedure itself. It sounds like you’re saying u wouldn’t date ppl who get the surgery, bc it’s so dangerous, that getting it is a sign of some mental/emotional/personal shortcoming. Aka: baggage. True?

-1

Anonymous #13 49w

If men can not want to date women for getting BBLs we’re allowed to not want a guy that got height lengthening surgery

1

Anonymous #4 49w

Absolutely. You just sound like the men who don’t date women over BBLs.

-1

Anonymous #13 49w

If a woman went and got a sketchy bbl, which is like the equivalent to getting limp lengthening surgery, that would absolutely be a valid reason to reject her.

5

Anonymous #8 49w

It is if you’re using it to draw the same unfair conclusions about one’s personality or mental health.

-1

Anonymous #8 49w

Never said it wasn’t.

-1

Anonymous #13 49w

Also I think it’s valid to not want someone who has had a cosmetic surgery period, totally valid preference

3

Anonymous #13 49w

This is like the whole “you can’t use body count to draw conclusions about someone’s personality” argument Yes absolutely you can to a point, I don’t want someone who has 100+ bodies just like I don’t want someone who has elected into risky cosmetic surgeries

4

Anonymous #8 49w

Totally. We just generally hate it when men shit on women for “inauthenticity,” but we can also bring that same energy to the table, is the point. It walks the line of reason and hypocrisy.

-2

Anonymous #8 49w

You can draw conclusions. You’re just probably not right about them. You’re also a shallow dick, in my opinion. But to each their own.

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #13 49w

And that’s fine with me. Bc if they can be allowed to not want ppl with plastic surgery so can women. It’s not being a hypocrite. What’s being a hypocrite is recognizing that they are allowed to do that but throw a fit when we do the same. It shows lack of confidence and very self hating insecurity. It gets to a point

1

Again. The degree of safety isn’t what we were talking about lol.

0

Anonymous #4 49w

It’s not the same as getting cosmetic surgery for health risk reasons. Like a nose job bc of a permanently broken bridge

1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #4 49w

Agreed. Cosmetic surgery for cosmetic’s sake isn’t the same as for health reasons.

3

Anonymous #4 49w

It goes in both directions. Some of the women in here got as much heat for male cosmetic surgery as do the men in the comment sections I was talking about. Which was my original comment lol.

0

Sorry thought I was replying to the others. So I wasn’t misunderstanding you; The unfair judgement is still there, and so too is the hypocrisy. Just because you have more statistical ammo doesn’t make your assessment of others any less premature than those of the conclusions drawn from the people who have made the exact same arguments that you have.

0

Comment Deleted

0

Absolutely true! The “inauthentic” part isn’t what I was discussing w you, though. I said multiple times that the same arguments you were using (I.e.: medical risks for the sake of cosmetics) have been used to shit on those who get any other form of cosmetic surgery.

0

Anonymous #14 49w

The fact that anything below 5’5” is “obscene” to you does say a lot about why these men are so insecure 💀

7

Comment Deleted

0

Again, the degree of danger is the only alteration of the argument, which doesn’t change the fact that you’re still using it to draw unfair conclusions about a person’s personality/mental health as others have done before you. You need not reiterate the same point for the 6th time lol. I understand it; doesn’t make it less premature.

2

Anonymous tomatogames 49w

The average height of a man is like 5’9-5’10 and in my area probably higher. Maybe obscene was a strong word choice but below 5’5 is not very common nd would likely be much shorter than many women which would limit options for them a lot. Still better than surgery tho

0