Anonymous #2 4w

the diff between the length of your arms and legs are very noticeable actually and the lack of ability to run too sooooo

18

Anonymous #5 4w

You can run with leg lengthening after a year more over when would you need to run while dating for it to even come up? Also you could just say it’s for a different reason. Arms and torso isn’t is only noticeable when doing the surgery twice to gain 6 inches

-1

Anonymous #2 4w

*is only noticeable

-1

Anonymous #2 4w

nah the dudes who get it look disproportionate and super unathletic— no one is more hard on a short guy than a short guy.

6

Anonymous #12 4w

If you think three inches is going to be visually obvious irl just speaking to a person and you’re going to have an opportunity to visually measure the ratios you are just overestimating reality. Also the athletic thing isn’t true there’s literally a dude who runs marathons and did it twice lmao

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

It’s not plastic surgery. It’s orthopedic surgery and extremely risky which is why very few doctors do it. Because it’s torture

13

Anonymous #10 4w

It’s the equivalent of for the reasons people list. It’s also their choice. I’m not going to encourage someone to get it. I’m also not going to judge one for getting it either.

-2

Anonymous #13 4w

I won’t judge but I won’t date someone who will willingly put themselves through torture for months if not years cause of an insecurity

5

Anonymous #13 4w

I’ve had 5 ortho knee surgeries. To willingly want to do that means you’re not mentally well

1

Anonymous #10 4w

Hey. To each their own. Y’all still sound like those dudes who get up in arms about women getting any form of plastic surgery.

-2

Anonymous #10 4w

That sucks. I’m sorry you’ve gone through that. It does sound like hell. I’m just sure there are people with deviated septum that’d say the same about nose jobs.

2

Anonymous #13 4w

And I disagree with plastic surgery, although you cannot relate these two, as one has years of recovery and pain that will make them suicidal, and the other is a couple months of mild to severe pain at most. You can’t compare plastic surgery to orthopedic

1

Anonymous #13 4w

Can’t compare cracking bones and forcing someone to be in a wheelchair to filler

1

Anonymous #10 4w

I can. And I am. Cause you’re still drawing unfair conclusions about a person’s mental health over their desire to change their appearance and the lengths they’re willing to go through.

0

Anonymous #13 4w

You cannot compare the two. You can compare cracking someone’s bones to cracking someone’s bones. You should do the research on why doctors don’t perform the surgery. There are far more negative outcomes than positive, and a far higher than average regret rate compared to other elective surgeries, which is the correct word you want, not plastic (as plastic does not mean elective)

2

Anonymous #10 4w

Bones also get cracked during facial reconstruction surgery? And you aren’t refusing to date someone over these negative outcomes though; you’re refusing to bc you think that someone who does it is insecure and mentally unwell. It’s the exact argument used against anyone that gets any form of gender affirmation/body mod.

0

Anonymous #13 4w

Cracked, not broken in half and separated inches apart. Again, look up why doctors refuse to do this surgery

4

Anonymous #13 4w

Cracks can heal in months. Gaps heal in years. Bone cell regeneration is some of the slowest cell growth in the body

3

Anonymous #13 4w

And you refuse the facts of the dangers of the surgery, the regret rate, the overall quality of life, the risk of infection, the risk of sepsis, the risk of amputation. The risks are exponentially higher than a nose jobs. Do your research on why this surgery should be illegal.

3

Anonymous #10 4w

I can dislike the dangers associated with the surgery while also not prematurely judging those who get it as unfit to date me.

0

Anonymous #13 4w

I can’t date someone who is willingly going to risk their life and cause themselves to suffer for years when therapy can solve that solution

2

Anonymous #13 4w

i wouldn’t date a guy who got plastic surgery either

3

Anonymous #10 4w

Cool. You do you. You just used the same series of arguments I’ve heard against other reconstructive/gender affirming surgeries, only with a harsher degree of severity. Make your peace with that.

3

Anonymous #13 4w

Oh my god fucking circles over band over can you read or are you really that dense? I’m not just saying it cause it’s “ew surgery” it has more negative outcomes. So as I said five hundred fucking times, look up why surgeons REFUSE to do this surgery but are okay with a bbl or a face lift. Shut the fuck up they’re not even remotely the same you dumbass

1

Anonymous #10 4w

You read the part where I said “with a harsher degree of severity”? Christ, stop getting so defensive. Just say it with ya chest.

0

Anonymous twirling_tornado 4w

Lil shallow if you asked me but I’m sure you have the same opinion of those who get PS.

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

“I refuse to listen to doctors because fuck them they clearly don’t know what they’re talking about” there is actual debate in the medical community whether this surgery should be illegal, and if it should be considered medical torture

1

Anonymous #13 4w

Facial reconstruction surgery is usually done to fix birth defects or correct issues caused by trauma💀 the “bone cracking” done in aesthetic surgeries like rhinoplasty is actually very small precise cuts. This is completely different to limb lengthening surgery where the bone is completely cut into two separate pieces, hence why it takes multiple MONTHS to heal from it. I haven’t had a rhinoplasty but I have had a septoplasty which is similar and the healing time is two weeks. Not comparable.

4

Anonymous #10 4w

We’re talking about your willingness to date someone who’s gotten a procedure, not the procedure itself. It sounds like you’re saying u wouldn’t date ppl who get the surgery, bc it’s so dangerous, that getting it is a sign of some mental/emotional/personal shortcoming. Aka: baggage. True?

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

If men can not want to date women for getting BBLs we’re allowed to not want a guy that got height lengthening surgery

1

Anonymous #4 4w

Absolutely. You just sound like the men who don’t date women over BBLs.

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

If a woman went and got a sketchy bbl, which is like the equivalent to getting limp lengthening surgery, that would absolutely be a valid reason to reject her.

5

Anonymous #8 4w

It is if you’re using it to draw the same unfair conclusions about one’s personality or mental health.

-1

Anonymous #8 4w

Never said it wasn’t.

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

Also I think it’s valid to not want someone who has had a cosmetic surgery period, totally valid preference

3

Anonymous #13 4w

This is like the whole “you can’t use body count to draw conclusions about someone’s personality” argument Yes absolutely you can to a point, I don’t want someone who has 100+ bodies just like I don’t want someone who has elected into risky cosmetic surgeries

4

Anonymous #8 4w

Totally. We just generally hate it when men shit on women for “inauthenticity,” but we can also bring that same energy to the table, is the point. It walks the line of reason and hypocrisy.

-2

Anonymous #8 4w

You can draw conclusions. You’re just probably not right about them. You’re also a shallow dick, in my opinion. But to each their own.

-1

Anonymous #13 4w

BBLs are far more safe than this stupid ass procedure. It’s more like if a woman gets leg lengthening surgery

1

Anonymous #13 4w

And that’s fine with me. Bc if they can be allowed to not want ppl with plastic surgery so can women. It’s not being a hypocrite. What’s being a hypocrite is recognizing that they are allowed to do that but throw a fit when we do the same. It shows lack of confidence and very self hating insecurity. It gets to a point

1

Anonymous #10 4w

Again. The degree of safety isn’t what we were talking about lol.

0

Anonymous #4 4w

It’s not the same as getting cosmetic surgery for health risk reasons. Like a nose job bc of a permanently broken bridge

1

Anonymous #13 4w

No it precisely is. I’m not judging a man for getting this surgery because it makes him “inauthentic” (which is why, as you said, men have hatred for women with BBLs) I’m judging their ability to make rational choices by choosing an extremely dangerous surgery. Two very different reasons. So yes, the degree of safety is what we’re talking about. I don’t give two shits about “inauthenticity”

1

Anonymous #4 4w

Agreed. Cosmetic surgery for cosmetic’s sake isn’t the same as for health reasons.

3

Anonymous #4 4w

It goes in both directions. Some of the women in here got as much heat for male cosmetic surgery as do the men in the comment sections I was talking about. Which was my original comment lol.

0

Anonymous #10 4w

Sorry thought I was replying to the others. So I wasn’t misunderstanding you; The unfair judgement is still there, and so too is the hypocrisy. Just because you have more statistical ammo doesn’t make your assessment of others any less premature than those of the conclusions drawn from the people who have made the exact same arguments that you have.

0

Anonymous #13 4w

No hypocrisy. If a woman gets a dangerous elective surgery, I would not date her. If a man got a (in your words) “inauthentic surgery” I would date him. There’s no hypocrisy because they’re two very different situations with two very different reasons of why I would refuse to date them

1

Anonymous #10 4w

Absolutely true! The “inauthentic” part isn’t what I was discussing w you, though. I said multiple times that the same arguments you were using (I.e.: medical risks for the sake of cosmetics) have been used to shit on those who get any other form of cosmetic surgery.

0

Anonymous #14 4w

The fact that anything below 5’5” is “obscene” to you does say a lot about why these men are so insecure 💀

7

Anonymous #13 4w

And as I stated (you keep forgetting silly) the health risks for a stupid ass leg lengthening surgery are FAR FAR FAR greater than a bbl. So yes, there is a clear distinct difference and no hypocrisy. If a man got a bbl I would have no issues. If a woman got leg lengthening I would have problems. One is dangerous and far often leads to amputation, death, or the loss of height, and the other is simple and has extremely low rates of issues. Stop equating the two, when they are not the same

1

Anonymous #13 4w

Stop whining about “hypocrisy” when there is absolutely no hypocrisy around

1

Anonymous #14 4w

Had me in the first half, lost me in the second

16

Anonymous #10 4w

Again, the degree of danger is the only alteration of the argument, which doesn’t change the fact that you’re still using it to draw unfair conclusions about a person’s personality/mental health as others have done before you. You need not reiterate the same point for the 6th time lol. I understand it; doesn’t make it less premature.

2

Anonymous #13 4w

No babes. Because I’m choosing if I would date them based on their choice in dangerous procedures aka this one. It’s not a change of argument. It’s my core reason of why I will not date them. Because they make dangerous decisions

1

Anonymous #13 4w

I’m going to reiterate it till it gets through your thick ass skull. Cause it’s not a change in argument, or topic, or hypocritical, it’s part of the conversation you just don’t want it to be because it makes the bs you said invalid

1

Anonymous tomatogames 4w

The average height of a man is like 5’9-5’10 and in my area probably higher. Maybe obscene was a strong word choice but below 5’5 is not very common nd would likely be much shorter than many women which would limit options for them a lot. Still better than surgery tho

0

Anonymous #14 4w

And the average height for a woman is 5’4, making 5’5 taller than most women which is not obscene

4