Anonymous #1 5w

Looks like someone is upset they got called out for not posting a question.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Looks like someone is clearly not a man

18

Anonymous #2 5w

Looks like someone is trying to define what being a man is. Perhaps you need to lay off logical fallacies and look into this guy's post history.

-3

Anonymous #1 5w

This is somehow the only post he’s made that is valid. Not saying that the guys in these situations are entitled to a relationship though

31

Anonymous #5 5w

False

-1

Anonymous #3 5w

"false"🤓☝🏻

3

Anonymous #5 5w

Lmao thank you for being someone who is actually sane on this post.

8

Anonymous #5 5w

Crazy how the times it’s happened I never just wanted sex and I made the feelings fade away and yet I still love and care about them deeply platonically, so yes it is false

0

Anonymous #3 5w

You never truly know someone until you're in a relationship with them. When you have what is called a crush you're in love with the idea of being in a relationship with them.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

1. that is anecdotal and thus essentially irrelevant. 2. exactly what #1 said you do not truly know that person and it was most likely limerence not love.

5

Anonymous #5 5w

You’re saying I don’t know my friends?

0

Anonymous #5 5w

Also your argument of being lust is also anecdotal, you don’t know the feelings of others you aren’t above anyone

0

Anonymous #3 5w

You know your friends to an extent. You don't know everything about them even if you think you do.

2

Anonymous #1 5w

Ig with that logic I might as well never form any or think of any connections as meaningful

0

Anonymous #3 5w

So why are we trying to use the slippery slope fallacy here with a little bit of a false dichotomy? You know that its not true, you're just trying to prove your point by making it seem like its one or the other.

6

Anonymous #1 5w

I think calling it lust is extremely disingenuous, I wouldn’t call it love necessarily either in most cases that people bring up as “friendzones” but I mean the cases where two parties are friends that one can develop deeper unrequited feelings

0

Anonymous #3 5w

So we can both agree that it isn't love necessarily. Would you agree that its the love of the idea of being in a relationship with that person that you are attracted to? Bc the reason why I say you don't know someone to the fullest extent is bc there's other things that you pick up on in a relationship, and you see them through all stages thick and thin. In the beginning stages those feelings are like the start of a fire and that fire is nurtured throughout the relationship developing more

4

Anonymous #1 5w

I mean yeah I get what you mean, but it’s like you get to know someone enough as is and see how well you click if you’re friends for a while and the romantic interest can develop after having been hanging out with/talking to each other for a while platonically. I know there are plenty of guys that become friends with women trying to get with them from the start and then say they’ve been “friendzoned.”

0

Anonymous #3 5w

Having said that though there’s been ones I think oh they’re a really cool person I wanna be friends with them and then I’ve developed interest romantically later on once the friendship grew, but I could figure out when they didn’t feel the same and let those feelings fade cause I still like them as a person

0