Anonymous #1 9w

The trial isn't determining whether she killed them. This is what this guy is talking about you aren't interested in knowing anything

9

Anonymous #3 9w

I honestly don't really care what the trial is about. She killed her kids. Yes the healthcare system failed her just like it failed so many people before. She still killed her kids

8

Anonymous #1 9w

Okay well then you should tune in for the trial that determines whether she killed her kids. That's not happening yet. That's not the subject of, or evidence in, the current trial. The current one is about whether or not she was too insane to know what she was doing.

7

Anonymous #3 9w

And btw "too insane to know what she was doing" does not mean "okay you can leave" but far more likely, permanant psychiatric hold, which if you know much of anything about psychoatric care is most likely going to be worse than most prisons.

5

Anonymous #3 9w

That fully depends on the psychiatric hospital since I’ve heard a good amount are actually really nice atp. The bad ones are still pretty bad, but not anywhere near what’s in movies and fiction, those ones are based more on historical psychiatric facilities which were actual torture

11

Anonymous #3 9w

the main concern people have with her going to a mental facility is that the conditions for release are usually more lenient. There’s plenty of cases of people pleading insanity and getting out way faster than if they had gone to prison. I doubt she’s staying in a mental hospital for longer than 6 years.

7

Anonymous #3 9w

She admitted that she killed her kids Also, I don't really care to tune into a murderer's trial

1

Anonymous #1 9w

That’s not what not guilty means. Not guilty in this instance places her in a psych ward instead of jail

5

Anonymous OP 9w

I never said that's what not guilty meant

5