Anonymous #1 1w

Just posted the same thing in the ask women section here and so far the one person that responded is pissed about it

-11

Anonymous #2 1w

Penn state just came out with a study showing women would rather go to jail than admit they were wrong

-7

Anonymous OP 1w

Link?

17

Anonymous OP 1w

Also not surprised, you dont need a study for this. Women will take their demonics to the grave

-11

Anonymous #2 1w

Yeah what?? Lmao. Admit they were wrong about what? Go to jail for how long and with what charge? This reads like such Reddit bait stg 💀

29

Anonymous #3 1w

Here's #1 looking up the statistic that you provided and no scholarly sources popped up. Im disappointed in you.

18

Anonymous OP 1w

People have already stated in the comments there that they can only access the abstract and you claim to not have the ability to screenshot the part in the article that has the data you're talking about

31

Anonymous #4 1w

I also found a comment on Facebook explaining that the source doesn’t exist, along with a pretty insightful look into why women actually don’t want to admit being wrong in general. I can post a screenshot of it in a sec

27

Anonymous #5 1w

It posted to the bottom of the comments because yikyak sucks now but that’s there

12

Anonymous #5 1w

Are you trying to present this as fact or?

1

Anonymous #5 1w

Fyi I found out that if you type a character above the pic it’ll stay where it belongs 🙏 the posting at the bottom as a new comment thing drives me nuts 😅

7

Anonymous #3 1w

I just realized you can also just tap the comment you’re trying to reply to after choosing the pic 🫩 so dumb but thanks for that tip!

3

Anonymous #4 1w

There is no abstract either. It’s not a real study

14

Anonymous #4 1w

Which part? I’m not presenting the screenshot as fact, it’s just a personal anecdote from someone who also proved the alleged study to be fake, or at the very least grossly misinterpreted if it does exist. The screenshot was just to show that this idea of women not taking accountability, regardless of the rate of it, boils down to a lack of security and fear of abandonment, rather than malice or pride.

9

Anonymous #5 1w

Gotcha, thank you for clarifying I was a little confused and didn't want to assume!

3

Anonymous #4 1w

Nah I appreciate that! I can see how it could’ve been a confusing claim on my part. Definitely disagree with OP on this one

5

Anonymous #6 1w

The study has been found to not correlate at all to what he is claiming. This dude is just trying to further the divide between men and women by showing how "smart" he is

14

Anonymous #4 1w

Yeah the abstract is about sentencing disparities. At least it is for the article he linked in ask women

4

Anonymous #6 1w

It’s actually sad that OP is like this cause it’s a very interesting article topic about how women may not take plea deals because they often get lighter sentencing. If I had access I would actually like to read it lol

18

Anonymous #2 1w

This comment alone helped me connect the dots on how we got to the fake stat. I’m assuming a high number of women not taking plea deals somehow got warped into accountability since they’re not admitting fault in a legal sense. Regardless, if a plea deal is an option in a trial they’re probably going to prison anyway. Wild how stats mean nothing when they’re grossly misinterpreted by some man with a low exposure podcast

19

Anonymous #5 1w

Also it doesn’t show how I think (I can’t read the article) it’s about drug offenses mostly, which can have gang activity from women. This leads to the possibility of higher risks if they “snitch”, especially as a woman. It’s just a actual r word trying to twist real studies

14

Anonymous #2 1w

I also wonder if it factors in other reasons one might not take a plea deal like not wanting something permanently on their record

5

Anonymous #6 1w

It’s actually sad studies from public universities are paywalled I actually wanna read it now 😔😭

9

Anonymous #2 1w

That makes so much sense. Critical thinking is a bitch for some people. Not us, thank god, but some 😔

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Understandably though. What if a woman came here and said are we surprised that men commit 90% of rape and murder?

18

Anonymous OP 1w

I wasn’t pissed lol, just wanted your source

9

Anonymous #7 1w

That would be a fair statement bc it’s mostly true, terrible people exist. however on the other side of the same coin, you must also recognize that more than 90% of widely recognized great figures have been men

-5

Anonymous #1 1w

What % of great figures would be women if we had the opportunity to be great figures throughout history

22

Anonymous #1 1w

Also a lot of “great male figures” were great because they had the help of some great women

19

Anonymous #6 1w

If given the opportunity, a larger amount, but not close to 1:1. Usually the assist doesn’t take the credit

-7

Anonymous #1 1w

And how would you know that?

5

Anonymous #1 1w

I’m not talking just assist. Mary Shelly didn’t just assist in the writing of Frankenstein lmao

14

Anonymous #1 1w

Well it’s not the same coin really. Because being a known inventor as a man doesn’t make up for our gender taking up the vast majority of violent crimes.

14

Anonymous #6 1w

Through a basic understanding of evolutionary psychology, some things just are. That’s a great unique instance, they both provided us with their time tested work

-6

Anonymous #7 1w

Def not, especially if you’re trying to correlate the two. If you’re looking at this from a normal distribution perspective, you’ll see that men will mostly reside at both ends of the extremes. They are both our geniuses of the world and our despicable specs of dirt we all wish didn’t exist

-6

Anonymous #1 1w

Bruh evolutionary psychology tells you men are by nature more likely to be great? Fuck off

23

Anonymous #1 1w

Well both are a result of the patriarchy of you think about it. Because men had so much power and women had no rights nothing stopped them from raping and murdering and women weren’t allowed to go to college and were discriminated against hence why we don’t have a plethora of female historical figures as men. To imply men are the superior geniuses just because we are men is false, and to imply we rape and murder just because we are men is equally false

13

Anonymous #6 1w

Ok you can’t keep up, you’re done.

-3

Anonymous #7 1w

I don’t think you understood what I said, the extremes are easily outnumbered by the average in this distribution model meaning most men won’t fall under either category. Your straw man doesn’t apply.

-5

Anonymous #1 1w

Holy dumbass

18

Anonymous #8 1w

💀💀💀

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Not really. There’s much more murderer and rapist men than genius men so it’s not a bell curve it’s closer to a plateau

8

Anonymous #1 1w

I feel like you’re not arguing any point anymore, just trying to tell me I’m wrong

12

Anonymous #7 1w

The point was already made and never contested really, we just veered off into the deep end. It started with you saying well what if girls came in and said such and so and after my reply it turned into semantic bs. Really interesting stuff here though

-4

Anonymous #1 1w

Bro you were the one who brought in the gender war shit with the “90% of great figures are men” when that had nothing to do with anything.. YOU derailed the conversation💀

12

Anonymous #9 1w

asharma@psu.edu belongs to amit sharma, not dr ananya sharma

1

Anonymous #9 1w

There is no ananya sharma at penn state btw she is at a different uni

5