Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
can a man explain to me that with all the evidence for the Cornell case people are still blaming Jane Doe?
upvote 20 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 12h

What is this

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

(Btw if they are convicted in court I do believe rapists deserve castratio/death) but right now the facts show she went there for a threesome, willingly took keyamine herself, and the stuff with the other 5 guys was, in her own words “none of the sexual stuff was illegal”. seems like it could be that once word got around that she was promiscuous at a frat house she decided to run with this story to save face. she lit sent a text saying “i’d be down to do a threesome again”

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

i'm confused on how a threesome = 5 other men being invited to "walk in and whip it out"

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

it seems like she consented to some of the sex, not all of it. consent to a threesome isn’t consent for other men to join in 💀 like you said, her text said she’d be down for a threesome, not a sevensome

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14h

according to her, she consented to 3 of them, said no to one so they kicked him out, and 3 others didn’t do anything sexual so yea it was all consensual

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 10h

oh you’re weird. even if you want to argue she wasn’t “technically” 🍇 under new york law, why are we ignoring the “free pussy” text in the gc?? 😭 the frat advertising her like that is 🍇ey as fuck. her consent wasn’t theirs to give. and you literally admit another man was brought into the situation and she had to say no before he was kicked out, yet somehow you’ve concluded it was all consensual?? you’re so weird for not seeing the issue here 😬

upvote 4 downvote