
Bc most white women have no back bone and will excuse a guy's racism, political stances, or religious beliefs because they're too happy to be a bird. You probably know a girl like this yourself. Most men sincerely believe a woman will not leave them/not go out with them for their beliefs/anti social behaviors and most of the time, they're right unfortunately.
I’m black and I find it fucking hilarious that racist are so obsessed with us even tho they to hate us like they go to sleep and wake up thinking about us and honestly I welcome it let them be racist and proud of it so that way we know who’s nothing more than a cowardly little b!tch
Bc white guys benefit from racism whether or not they make funni jok, so even if we don’t indulge the goalpost gets moved and we’re still treated as if we’re complicit anyway. That being said tho fuck the n words im not defending allat, the acts of saying the n-word I mean not black people
I’m a white guy, I say it around friends and sometimes people I just met but never to a black person. And I usually use it in the this my “buddy” replace with “nword” rarely in a derogatory way and it’s funny how upset yall are because there is literally nothing you can do about it
No that’s not what I’m saying. The n-word has been used to demean African Americans for hundreds of years by mainly White people. Now the word has been reclaimed by the community. Going a word that has been so derogatory, demeaning, demoralizing, into something of solidarity. Now is every member of my community going to use it in a non-demeaning way? No. However, it’s something that is now intended to stay within the community. There are definitely no supposed to be any outliers using that word.
I’m so happy that you are able to worry about one community and not the other. However I don’t have that choice because I’m subjected to racism all the time. By this comment I can tell you aren’t African American so obviously you wouldn’t know why it’s bad to say the n-word if your not black.
That’s just incorrect my brother in Christ yes physical violence is never the answer but u do realize we had a war over slavery Lmaoo like u do realize there were people in fact my grandparents were slaves brother ur so lost in the concept of “it’s a word” bc ur ignorance maybe due to u just being to young maybe the school system or maybe ur upbringing idk but to act like there wasn’t any type of physical violence done is… quite frankly stupid
But that’s not how that has happened historically or today! I agree that violence in a community is bad however you don’t get to disrespect and disregard another. White people made the word to dehumanize us for years and when that didn’t work as effectively they moved on to something else. Legislation, housing, education, etc. We reclaimed the word in solidarity and it’s for someone to use it outside the community holds a totally different weight than us saying it.
I made a comment stating that your aren’t African American based on the way you spoke. That in itself isn’t inherently racist. And another thing, you said you’re not living during the topics’ relevant time. How is racism against African Americans not relevant today? Our current administration is racist among a plethora of other things I can’t say. However, there was a huge issue with gerrymandering a few weeks back that would SNUFF out my community’s voice to vote in Tennessee.
So you didn’t read a thing I just typed… It’s a word that has been used to dehumanize my people. Then was reclaimed by MY COMMUNITY, so it’s something for the community to use. With the historical weight behind it, other who aren’t African American shouldn’t be using it because that is inherently racist.
I know the history of the word😭😭 I’m just not going to let something that happened a long time ago effect what and how I act around my other white friends it’s not ignorance because I understand why it’s so offensive and I respect black people I have a lot of black friends I’m not racist
My sister in law is black. My nieces and nephew are black. Even if they weren't however i respect people's cultures. The word is slur!! Plus using it in the context you are doesn't even make sense bc it's literally means a black man, using it to refer to white people is just an incorrect use of the word. There r SO many other words you can use to refer to your friends. You're a shitty person and i hope a women leaves u too one day to maybe prompt you to be better.
Agreed. There was this really racist guy at my college and he lasted 1 month. He kept saying wild Nazi shit, wearing durags while calling people slurs, and tried SAing a girl. Everyone made a petition on YikYak to jump his ass and people made like actual flyers of the day he turned 18 so everyone would know. He dropped out before we could. His buddies then became the targets
Just because slavery happen a long time ago, the affects it put into place are still present in todays society, and will probably be for decades to come. If you truly were not racist you wouldn't say it all. You're disrespecting black ppl by saying behind their backs. I know of your so called black friends knew that you say it, they wouldn't be friends with you.
Okay? You weren’t there. He nearly burned down his dorm twice because he couldn’t cook microwave mac and cheese. His first words on campus were “where the good pussy at?” He tried threatening some of our football players with a gun he “definitely” had to “go back to their own countries”. Any time he got in trouble he called up his rich dad and started crying to him saying to call his lawyer. He drugged a woman and tried to assault her. This guy deserved a good punch to the face
imo anyone who says the n word is racist. context doesn't matter. it means one of two things. 1: you don't know the history of the word, like maybe English isn't your first language and you didn't know its significance. 2: you DO know the history of the word and use anyway. incorrectly, mind you bc again it literally refers to a black person, specifically a black man. This goes for literally any slur. I don't even like it when men say something is gay.
It's not that subjective. You're just not funny. Man I wish yik yak wasn't anonymous so all of y'all on this post could get kicked out of your colleges. If that happens or when some evidence of you saying the n word comes to light in front of the wrong crowd and you get beaten down, i bet you won't be laughing.
Saying the n word isn’t inherently racist. Is a black person who calls another black person the n word racist? If not, why? Its just a word and context matters. It is only racist if directed towards someone with racial hatred. Is it racist for a white guy to call another white guy the n word? Or what if someone says it when quoting someone else?
I should also bring up the point that the n word is only so toxic in the minds of so many people because those people chose to assign a significant amount of weight to that word. If everyone agreed to not take offense from the word, the word would then be meaningless regardless of historical usage. You chose to become so enraged at something completely abstract and it bewilders me that you cannot even realize youre doing so.
Youre logic is racist. Its either everyone who says it is racist or no one who says it is racist, there cannot be selectivity for who get to say a slur or not. Slurs can be used in a bigoted racist manor but that does not also mean the usage of the word is inherently racist. Regardless of history the word only has as much weight as you chose to give it.
To answer your questions. no it's not racist if a black person says it to another black person. why? bc they've reclaimed the slur for their own use to refer to one another. it's only racist if a non black person says it, whether it's out of hatred or not! yes it is racist and grammatically incorrect for a white guy to say it to another white guy, or when quoting a black person. hope this helps!
Whats is really going on is that you and everyone here defending the n word are all extreme narcissist. you have an immense amount of jealousy over black peoples ability to say the word. it bothers you so much you say it anyway bc it the negative attention you receive feeds your ego. i'm sorry if you didn't get enough attention as a child where now u had to resort to using racial slurs for a crumb of attention
You trying to insult me doesnt make your argument any more right or superior. I will continue to use the n word not because i have some unfounded hatred for blacks, but because people like you find the word so weighted that you would literally lose your mind over a word. To me, subjectively, its hilarious.
whats funny is you literally just proved my point? you only say it bc you're desperate for attention! you are so narcissistic that you're literally doing all this mental gymnastics to try to put the blame on everyone else for getting offended or uncomfortable when you use a racial slur. i don't expect someone as pathetic as you to understand that since narcissists themselves can never be the ones in the wrong.
and several black have told you regardless of the context and if you say it around a black person, you're still saying a racist slur. so yes if you did have respect for black ppl you wouldn't say it all! however that would mean no one would pay attention to you anymore and hurt ur precious ego
I dont say it around blacks people out of respect, so you suggesting I do the opposite for attention means nothing. You can chose to be offended by the word or not, that is your right, but It doesnt mean i have no right to say it. And again, it seems the insults are one sided, that suggests your inability to have intellectual discussions.
I dont know why you believe I have some need for attention by saying the nword around blacks, I dont use it around blacks out of respect because I understand people like you find the word so apprehensive that you lose your mind over it regardless of context. I use it purely privately with my friends because the word is funny to me. You must understand that I dont get offended by the word since it means nothing to me, like any other word, and merely muttering it is not inherently racist.
saying it period is inherently racist and yes you are doing it for attention. you very well could've seen my post and not have commented at all. you did though and proceeded to argue with the black ppl in the comments section abt how you have a "right" to say a racial slur. literally no matter the context or the situation, saying the n word is racist. i really hope that clicks for you one day. you might think ur friends r finding it "funny" but maybe they r too scared to stand up to you...
It’s not racist. Racism requires there to be systematic oppression in place to hinder an ethnicity from financial, social or otherwise growth or opportunities in society. White people might experience discrimination, but they do not experience racism bc they set that system up
As a black person, the nuance you need to understand here is that people who colloquially use terms that previously oppressed them as a sign of camaraderie, joking or otherwise are reclaiming it. That word does not hold the same meaning when people who are not black say it. Yes, it’s possible for black people to use the word in a negative connotation, but it is our prerogative to do so because we were the ones in chains
Racism does not have any of those qualifiers. It is the word for racial prejudice; however, due to the word having cultural significance control over that words use became important. Thus an effort began to narrow the definition of the word so that, whole keeping its importance, its would only be usable by those who were changing the word. You don’t see the same qualifiers attached with other words of less significance but similar meanings. Sexism, ableism, classism, etc.
No, that’s called prejudice or discrimination. Racism, as the other commenter stated, does indeed require systemic support. For example: white supremacy in the United States had a plethora of laws codified for the explicit intention of the subjugation of non-white individuals and reinforcing that cultural norm of white supremacy. That is racism. some random person saying they don’t like white people, while living within the United States, is discrimination and prejudice.
solely because you’re, seemingly, a white supremacist who insists on the existence of “anti-white racism”, that does not mean that such racism exists within the United States. if there was a nation that systemically targeted white people ad the United States targeted not-white people, then within that country prejudice towards white people could be considered racism; but not in the vast majority of countries.
If you want another example you can look at how the word “sanitary” is used. If someone sneezes into their hands and then they don’t wash them, you and I would say that is not sanitary, but in some fields like global health it is considered sanitary. The reason for this is that the definition of “sanitary” is narrowed to only when something is free of fecal matter. Aside from that you cover it in whatever bile and bacteria you like and it will still be classified as “sanitary”.
and this is when we start discussing anti-intellectualism and its harms, as you so aptly displayed. solely because you do not like the definition, does not mean you get to arbitrarily change it. there are distinctions between racism, prejudice, and discrimination for explicit reasons.
keywords: “original definition” yes, I am indeed accusing you of being an anti-intellectual (at best). let’s not forget how you’re also trying to parrot the white supremacist propaganda of “reverse racism”. you can’t exactly hide behind a flimsy facade of “highlighting the quirks of academia and pushing you to pursue more” when you’re actively disregarding the progress that academia has made when it’s beneficial to your ideological beliefs. essentially “shooting yourself in the foot”.
I’m not parroting “reverse racism”. As I said before that term was created to fill the gap created by changing the definition of racism. I don’t use it, cause I don’t use the altered definition of racism. I’m also going to need an elaboration on what process I have disparaged. You mean changing definitions? Because I didn’t disparage that.
except, you do, even if you don’t openly acknowledge it. that’s exactly what this was, then you went on to explain the topic through a lens of pseudo-intellectualism (which is indeed inherently anti-intellectual) the “altered definition” is the scholarly one. as I said, you’re an anti-intellectual, who’s likely a white supremacist white just enough self-awareness to know that you can’t openly advocate for white supremacy without societal backlash, so you engage in these disingenuous tactics.
if you’re not actually a white supremacist, then I apologize, but it’s ultimately on you for parroting the same exact lines that white supremacists use to subliminally spread their ideological beliefs. you don’t get to discredit academic progress merely because you dislike the outcome.
Wrong. As I explained to you before the definition of racism you are using is used in specific fields of sociology. In other fields that definition isn’t used, the common definition is. History, literature, political science all don’t use that definition. Just like how microbiology doesn’t use the definition of sanitary I mentioned.
you can keep regurgitating “wrong” as much as you’d like, you’re not winning against the allegations of anti-intellectualism. political science and history both recognize the sociological definition of racism, you’re fundamentally incorrect in that claim. like I said, the issue ultimately boils down to your refusal to accept academic progress and insistence on parroting white supremacist propaganda.
do individual students *pursuing a major* have any credibility in the consensus of the field they’re actively learning? what you should’ve said is “ask a political science or history professor”, not some dipshit student. truly, you’re not helping your case on the anti-intellectual front.
the “original definition” is not the current one, for good reason. it’s a shame that you disagree, but it’s essentially meaningless. there’s a reason why people dedicate their lives to studying these topics, and I can assure you some arrogant 20-something year old that’s actively pursuing a degree does not have a say in the topic. I’m talking about you, in case that went over your head. yes, now I also assumed your age and degree status.
I’ve already discussed that topic, common use vs definition. all that implies is a shared misconception on the term itself, which heavily aligns with the poor state of the U.S. public education system (specifically focusing on the United States). all you’re highlighting is how common ignorance is in this topic, which is true.
as I stated, repeatedly, a common use does not override the original definition, it merely indicates the common understanding or usage of a word. definitions can change to adapt to common use, but it is not inherent. most people are unaware of the academic progress in the definition of racism, as they’re woefully uneducated on said topic.
HOLD UP. Did you just claim a commonly held definition of a word is incorrect? Thats not how language works. Words are tools to convey meaning. If people commonly change how a word is used its definition changes with it. Like the world “insanity.” Much like you reposting the same already addressed claim over again and expecting a different result. And I’ll leave things there.
there is a reason why multiple people are calling you racist. I recommend you take a minute, step back from this conversation, and seriously take their remarks into consideration. unless of course, you don’t give a fuck about being called racist because you genuinely are a white supremacist…
as I *just stated*, definitions *CAN* change with common use, but it does not inherently and automatically change. you’re essentially advocating that people’s overwhelming ignorance on the topic of racism is justification for disregarding the modern definition in favor for the original one. looks like we need to repost this section once AGAIN
it seems like you don’t understand the definition of that term, and how it relates to your initial “train tracks” comment. it might be a shocking thing for someone like you to hear, but not all perspectives are worth considering. for example: the perspective of a white supremacist or one of a neonazi are both utterly worthless and, indeed, do not deserve to be considered in the slightest.
This might be a shock to you, but the instinct to label things is not coming from anywhere good but from a place of fear and indoctrination. That is the very same way that McCarthyism gained power; because the label, regardless of whether or not it is valid or appropriate or even true, became the determinant for truth and respect. There are better mentalities.
what an odd whataboutism that was. since you seemingly need a refresher on the conversation: I never labeled you as anything, I criticized your cognitive dissonance as you jumped to support the other commenter who was parroting the “racism against whites” bullshit, while they attempted to discredit academic progress in favor of racism’s “original definition”. i recommend that you redirect some of that energy in maintaining your preconceived biases towards furthering your educational journey.
unless, of course, you independently identified with either label of “white supremacist” or “neonazi” after I cited those ideologies within my previous reply as examples of perspectives that do not deserve considering. I’ll let you decide: did you shift to a whataboutism, or did you identify with one of those terms?
Did you somehow miss the words “for example”? to make an example, and to change the topic, are not the same thing. why do I need to explain this simple difference to you? it is not my fault that you fail to recognize fascism when it is presented to you, and furthermore advocate in favor of it. you truly thought you did something, didn’t you?
Slavery is actually still happening y’all we’ve gotta decolonize that myth. The 13th amendment which “abolished” slavery left a loophole called the exception clause: “except as a punishment for crime” which motivated the creation of Black codes and vagrancy laws to criminalize blackness. This is what became the industrial prison complex, and generates over $10 billion in yearly economic output today.