Anonymous #3 3w

I mean the original tweet

11

Anonymous OP 3w

My point still stands. She never said it IS all men, she days how do we know which mean aren't those ones. Reading comprehension is a very important skill for peace of mind.

-1

Anonymous #3 3w

The overarching message is that they have to assume all men are though…

7

Anonymous #1 3w

the thing that sucks is how common and normalized it's becoming. it's excusable when it shouldnt be, its a crazy double standard

9

Anonymous #2 3w

though i disagree with "all men" i agree that its okay to not trust a man until they've proven it, especially since a lot of harm comes from men. trust is almost always something to be earned, especially if it comes from somewhere where trust is less common

23

Anonymous OP 3w

No... It's not... It's that they have to assume all men CAN, not that they will, that they can. That they are physically capable of it. If you're butt hurt by that then maybe you should crack a textbook

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Oh my god its almost like people can have different opinions on a message

6

Anonymous #5 3w

Im referring to the tweet :/

1

Anonymous #5 3w

*I trust many men, and I trust ALL of my male friends, I realize the wording is unclear

3

Anonymous OP 3w

The point of the tweet is that there are good men, but MEN cannot be the ones to decide what a good man is because they have a warped and biased perception for how good men treat women- ie watching and getting off to videos of rape, but not doing the rape

2

Anonymous #3 3w

Lmao there we go

11

Anonymous OP 3w

That's actually not how communication works sweetie. This isn't a fictional story that uses curtains as a metaphor for political separation. What you're doing is called a straw man fallacy.

2

Anonymous #3 3w

Has anyone ever called you annoying?

10

Anonymous OP 3w

Sounds like you're mad you got called out for trying to discredit this post by arguing an assumption YOU made about it rather than simply admitting that you misunderstood it and were being defensive

2

Anonymous #3 3w

MY ISSUE IS WITH THE TWEET IS YOUR REEDING COMPREHENSION ZERO. THE TWEET CLEARLY MEANS ONE THING DIFFERENT FROM THE POST BY #5

2

Anonymous OP 3w

READING*

5

Are you a guy or girl?

1

Anonymous OP 3w

guy

1

Anonymous vangogh 3w

I meant #3 who responded, because theres 100% a bias of “its more all women posts than all men” if your a woman because you see what applies to you more, men will think theres more all men posts when its probably pretty 50/50

0

Anonymous #5 3w

Dw, not you, i meant pottymouthdumbfuck

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Bro doesn't understand anthropology. All humans are biased against the group they are not in. That's just normal, it doesn't automatically equate to prejudice hence why I listed both terms, because you can be biased but not prejudiced, not vice versa.

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

oh did they delete that comment?

1

Anonymous vangogh 3w

Yeah

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Once again, I know it's the tweet, that's specifically what my comments are referring to you silly goose. Dont attack my reading comprehension when you're the one who clearly lacks it babe.

3

Anonymous #3 3w

Huh?

5

Anonymous #3 3w

Are you a woman?

7

Anonymous OP 3w

Yeah I know.... I'm TALKING about the tweet..... I'm literally referring to exact words from her tweet. Yelling at me about my reading comprehension when YOU aren't actually reading what I said is just telling on yourself atp

2

Yeah but the fact that its such a small number of men and we all get blamed for it, its such a misleading tweet too

5

Anonymous #3 3w

What?

7

Anonymous OP 3w

It’s not that we’re trying to blame ever man for it, it’s that we’re saying we have to fear any man could be responsible for

6

Anonymous OP 3w

No, I'm non binary. the fact you asked that says a lot about your mentality. Once again just kinda showing your own ignorance here by not reading what I said and then insulting my intelligence

-2

Anonymous #3 3w

Yikes i posted this in ask men…

5

Anonymous OP 3w

Maybe get better reading comprehension, you seen really confused on following a very simple to understand conversation without putting words in people's mouths or being intentionally disingenuous.

0

Anonymous #3 3w

Congrats i read something differently than you and you wanna be a bitch about it.

3

Anonymous #3 3w

Comprehend this 🖕🏻

1

Anonymous vangogh 3w

yes this you really shouldn't trust anyone until they've earned it

20

Anonymous OP 3w

Yeah and you also didn't ask anything.... And the person you're replying to is a woman... So your point is redundant as fuck.

4

Anonymous #3 3w

Womp womp

7

Anonymous OP 3w

That's not what happened tho, you can't just change the meaning of someone's words and claim that's what they said. By your logic i can say your post is implying men shouldn't be held accountable for jerking it to child porn. See how the straw man fallacy?

3

Anonymous OP 3w

Bro you can't even comprehend what the tweet is actually saying and you wanna talk about my reading. I've worked with chimps that have a better understanding of English grammar than you. Stay ignorant, goodnight

3

WOAH THAT IS BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT. I HAVE SPEND SO MUCH TIME REPORTING CSAM AND RAPE CONTENT ON REDDIT AND TELEGRAM SO YOU CAN GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU FUCKING KEYBOARD WARRIOR. GO TO FUCKING HELL JACKASS

5

Anonymous OP 3w

Spent*

7

Also misquoting me? I said womp womp not wamp wamp

3

Anonymous #3 3w

It’s online material. It is open to interpretation.

2

Anonymous #2 3w

i feel like the tweet is saying that like you don't know what people do in private, and its really fucked up to learn that a terrible website had so many visits. i understand where they are coming from but i personally feel like what individuals do in private doesn't affect your individual relationships with them, unless you are romantically involved/starting a life with them.

6

Anonymous vangogh 3w

Very true

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Still not how communication works babe. Once again, if that's how it works I it was I could completely change everything your post is saying into a sexist mess, but that would be a straw man. Do you not know what that is? Not surprised.

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

Bro just admitted he had no logical defense outside of logical fallacies.

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

Wow.... Seems like you just got mad instead of hearing the point... I'm NOT doing that to you get unlike you I know that IS a logical fallacy and not correct, so why do you think you have the right to do it to a woman? Answer me that Mr "Interpretation"

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

No. It's not. It is not literature. It's not a law. It's not translated. What they are saying is what they mean and to add anything else to it is putting words in their mouth which is a straw man fallacy. Once again, indicating you have NO LOGICAL ARGUMENT

0

Anonymous OP 3w

You don't all get blamed for it. That's the problem here. You are stuck on the idea that we think it's all men when we literally do not and never have. You're not here for a good faith discussion

13

Anonymous #3 3w

Maybe just stop engaging then? Whatever point you’re trying to make against op is kinda lost when you accused them of marital rape and csam. That with the clear freakout? Even if you were right, stuff that like that makes your point look bad.

4

Anonymous #7 3w

Maybe learn how to read dipshit. I didn't say he actually did support it, I'm saying that if HIS logic about interpreting other people's words is applied to him I could twist his words INTO that to point. I'm using a straw man on him to exemplify it. Idiot

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Personal attacks also just demean your point, by the way.

3

Anonymous #7 3w

Op is literally claiming that he can completely change the meanings of another's words by "interpreting" it differently when in reality that isn't how communication works, you can't just change the meaning of someone's words into what you WANT it to say.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

You can’t, that’s correct. So that’s a good reason to say they’re a rapist and child abuser in your mind?

6

Anonymous #7 3w

So to make this point extra clear because I had already explained straw men twice, I said "if your logic is applied to you, this could be what your post says". And he got mad I put words in his mouth, while still defending HIS straw man. That's hypocrisy

1

Anonymous #7 3w

Show me what part of that comment says he commits marital rape or watched child pornography? You can't, because I didn't, I said he said "womp womp" to it because he did. So yeah, he is definitely part of the sexist half of men if he's downplaying rape.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

“But definitely you” I did show you. I see you realized how wrong you were and deleted that comment. A step in the right direction! If you’re trying to draw an idea of explaining that someone’s logic is flawed, maybe state so? And maybe don’t accuse them of disgusting crimes in the process?

3

Anonymous #7 3w

No.... Once again I was using their logic against them.... If you don't like my logic then you're literally in agreement with me that OP is just throwing out a hissy fit over HIS intentional misinterpretation of the tweet. It's called a Link Turn in debate

1

Anonymous #7 3w

I DID state so, twice... And they continued to use that flawed logic..... Once again I was not ACTUALLY saying they do it l, and that comment itself actually doesn't even say what YOU claim I said if you read it according to english grammar rules.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

But they did not do the same you did. Can you show me where they said that you are definitely a rapist?

4

Anonymous #3 3w

If you’re so sure of that, why did you feel the need to delete it

3

Anonymous #7 3w

Sweetheart if you're not going to read the replies and just keep doing what OP is doing where you change the meaning of the words into what YOU WANT it to say so that you can be mad at it instead of engaging actual debate tactics upi can just stop taking

1

Anonymous #7 3w

I didn't? Bro what are you even talking about?

1

Anonymous #7 3w

I didn't say they said I was a rapist I'm talking about the LOGIC they used. A to point you've proven that you're not actually reading my replies or smart enough to understand ACTUAL debate tactics when they are used. Come back when you can read.

1

Anonymous #7 3w

We're done here. You've proven that you don't understand middle school level debate tactics OR know how to correctly read what someone is saying without putting words in their mouth and ignoring the context of the conversation.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

The YouTube video course you took on debate is failing you. You made a personal attack on multiple people, a known poor tactic in any debate, as it shows you can’t control your temper or as a backup because you can’t defend what you’re saying. The idea that people don’t get what you’re saying is also a weak point of debate, as it is literally your job in debate for people to see your point. I’ve been reading your replies. If I hadn’t it would be impossible for me to continued responding.

4

Anonymous #3 3w

Your “actual debate tactic” so far have been known things to avoid in debate. Whatever you’re paying for college is too much for what you’re learning.

5

Anonymous #7 3w

"Not all men" but based on this behavior and adamant refusal to engage in good faith (ignoring the debate tactic to claim an attack on character) you two aren't part of the good men either. Not raping women isn't enough to be a good man.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

Literally even told you WHAT tactic it is so if you are struggling to understand it that's on YOU for lacking the skills to google something. If your only argument is a straw man then don't get mad if someone straw man's YOU to point out the flawed logic

0

Anonymous #7 3w

I'm not sure how you managed to get into a college with a this grade reading level but I don't have the crayons necessary to help you understand a point that's just too complex for your brain to grasp as you've proven in this thread. Stay dumb, have a day

0

Anonymous #3 3w

You know nothing about myself or op besides what you’ve seen here. You believe I’m not a good man, despite not knowing if I am a man, and solely based off the fact I don’t like you accusing someone of a vile act. Please seek help.

5

Anonymous #7 3w

Yeah that's literally the whole fucking point of the OG tweet that OP got mad at for saying is accusing all men of rape when it's not. You can keep throwing a fit all you want, it's not going to change the words that are actually there and what they mean.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

Once again I wasn't accusing them of it. Christ if people like you can vote no wonder Donald Trump is president. You don't READ anything before you actually start to throw a fit about it. Come back when you can make an argument without a straw man

0

Anonymous #7 3w

Now, you've made it abundantly clear that you either cannot or will not actually read the words that are written and instead want to get mad at he words you WANT to have been written. So you don't want to engage in a logical discussion, so we're done here.

0

Anonymous #3 3w

I didn’t vote for trump. I can’t support someone who actively wants me dead. Great scapegoat. You prove again that you don’t know me. So please stop claiming what I am.

4

Anonymous #7 3w

Oh you mean like how you were doing time my comments and how OP was doing to the tweet!!!!! Sound like you finally understand the problem with straw man's but still lack the ability to realize that OP was using one. Shocker. Reading comprehension is dead

0

Anonymous #3 3w

I made no claim about your character. The closest I did was said you should seek help on this topic and state that you’ve probably been taught wrong. Op could be wrong or right, I’m not nor have I tried to defend their statement. I took issue when you explicitly stated “but definitely you” in context to marital rape and csam. I don’t understand what’s hard to grasp for you.

1

Anonymous #7 3w

I'll stop claiming what you are when you stop doing that to me and stop defending OP doing it to the tweet. Tu quoque, Mon frére en Christ. We're done here.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

I'm not engaging with someone who is just repeating the same straw man over and over despite having it corrected three times now. Clearly you don't actually care about men being good or bad, you care about society's perception of men. You refuse to read

0

Anonymous #3 3w

Okay, then don’t. You’ve repeatedly said you’re done yet here you are. I’m just going to block and move on, maybe you can stop allowing me rent free in your head. I hope you have a wonderful day

4

Anonymous #7 3w

And I don't know what's hard to grasp for you about I am literally using the logic they gave about interpreting statements online and showed how it is NOT logical by creating a shocking statement they didn't ACTUALLY believe. Can you just not read at all??

0

Anonymous #7 3w

You're mad that you're wrong and are now harassing me because YOU can't read properly. The irony about claiming I'm the one that keeps coming back when you keep attacking someone who never had a weapon. Providing my point. Goodbye.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

❤️

0

Anonymous #3 3w

I hope your pillow is warm on both sides, also you can interpret meaning from a text. There is no emotion or visual cues behind it, meaning written language is in fact a less obvious form of communication than verbal language so like i said before comprehend this 🖕🏻 You probably think im mad because texting doesn’t give the same amount of info as verbally speaking im not im laughing at how much of a fucking pompous asswipe you are and because i think the middle finger is funny.

0

Anonymous OP 3w

This is a long way to say "I'm mad that I can't make a straw man and put words in other people's mouths because that's not how human communication works, written or otherwise." You don't NEED visuals to NOT assume things that weren't said.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Written language not conveying tone does not justify you making a straw man fallacy about a point no one made and putting words in their mouth. Once again you can't just add or remove words from someone's statement to change the meaning of it.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Interpretation does not involve adding or removing context. You are ADDING the context of "all men" which neither the tweet OR post ever says. That is the DEFINITION of a straw man and literally proves that you either cannot read or are choosing ignorance

1

Anonymous OP 3w

I never said you CAN'T interpret meaning from text, I said you can't create a straw man and call that interpretation. You are adding words they do not say or imply so you have a justification to attack their point. You are not AT ALL trying to have a convo

1

Anonymous OP 3w

The irony of you making another straw man fallacy about what I said in order to continue to defend the original straw man is funny as fuck dude. Sorry but the fact of the matter is YOU are WRONG and LYING about what they said. That makes you the bigger ass

2

Anonymous OP 3w

Bro you've had it explained multiple times to you that the tweet does not say nor imply all men and yet your argument is "well I want to BELIEVE it does so that means I get to just say it's my interpretation and I can put whatever words in their mouth!"

3

Anonymous #3 3w

Damn you’re mad

0

Anonymous OP 3w

Yes because you are literally denying the rules of language and putting words in people's mouths. It's not a stretch atp to assume you're just a chauvinist bc you continuously show you don't care what they actually said, only what you want to be mad at.

0

Anonymous OP 3w

The tweet doesn't imply anything different than the post. If YOU read it as all men that is because YOU wanted to put words in their mouth and attack them for something they didn't say. That's a sign you still have a lot of misogyny to undo.

0

Anonymous #3 3w

Why are you so angry? Eat some food, drink some water get some rest, enjoy some sunshine. It will help a lot

0

Anonymous OP 3w

10/10 DARVO execution buddy. Couldn't have made it more clear if you wore a sign that says "Victim Complex". Have a good rest of your crucifixion since you wanna pretend to be a Pascal lamb.

0

Anonymous OP 3w

The irony of you posting this when you're actively NOT listening to other people. Misogynists LOVE to say they aren't misogynists and then turn around and act misogynistic by talking over women and putting words in their mouth in order to justify attacking

1

Anonymous OP 3w

It's NOT 50/50 though honey. You're right that people will be exposedt O one more than the other but in the game of pure numbers there are more sexist posts against women than there are men because sexism has existed longer than feminism. Statistica.com

0

Anonymous #3 3w

I mean the oop intentionally used the data maliciously and misrepresented it. Im not a misogynist, quite frankly women scare me to death and the ones that don’t i would do anything for, so stop name calling and fuck off

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Bro just stop get a life

1

Anonymous OP 3w

But she didn't. YOU made an assumption about what she was saying and got mad at that when she never said or implied it. At the end of the day YOU cannot be the one to decide if you're acting like a misogynist, because YOU are biased towards yourself.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

This does literally nothing but make me concerned that you lack basic reading comprehension skills and are insisting the post says something it is not. this is also an appeal to authority logical fallacy, being a teacher doesn't make you a good person.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Bro this is the most obvious lie since Trump claimed to have 5% body fat. Just sit down and admit you jumped the gun and didn't actually read what was written before throwing a toddler tantrum about whatever the fuck you wanted to bitch about.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

What the fuck does trump have to do with this huh?

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Says the one bitching about shit

1

Anonymous #3 3w

She 1000% did, if you can’t tell that i think you need to work on your reading comprehension and research skills and also get a life

1

Anonymous OP 3w

She literally did not. I'm sorry you're a fucking idot who can't read basic english. The tweet literally says the fucking opposite you whiney dumbass. ATP you're basically admitting you are a sexist rape apologist who refuses to read before attacking.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

You claimed to be a high school teacher and yet you are making up words that was never said. The most obvious fucking lie in the world.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

He doesn't have anything to do with it..... It's a COMPARISON of how obvious your lie is. which if you were ACTUALLY a teacher like you claim you would've understood so thanks for admitting you're 10000% NOT teacher and 1000% lying to look smarter

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Now Don fucking @ me again until you graduate from 5th grade and have a basic reading comprehension. YOU were the one who is too stupid to understand "it's not all men but we have no way of knowing which ones". As explained several times.

-1

Anonymous #3 3w

Fuck mb i just worked a 10 i misread it, are you that one jobless friend? This is what yall do?

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Shut the fuck up you dumb fucking piece of shit

1

Anonymous #3 3w

I thought it said the most obvious lie because trump said he was whatever, again texting vs verbal

1

Anonymous #3 3w

I hope you seek therapy

1

Anonymous #2 3w

I wish you were right about the man hate thing but sadly there are women that will abort if it’s a boy with the reason being “they don’t want to bring another oppressor into this world.”

-1

Anonymous OP 3w

Texting vs verbal isn't a reason here for lacking basic reading comprehension. Poe's law doesn't apply when I'm using practice language bud.

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Bro its not this deep, i hope you get help

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

do you have actual evidence of that happening??

1

Anonymous #2 3w

Sure

1

Anonymous #2 3w

https://youtu.be/kJ09N6DxGOY?si=zG_HV8jIR4zF6YNY https://youtu.be/PFys7oCkeMw?si=6TU2TH_6DCCT6d_T https://youtu.be/YOZ5ZwhduXU?si=NYbEzrHIV32XicdH

1

Anonymous OP 3w

The overarching message is "we don't know which men are the bad ones so we won't pretend we do and be cautious of all of them" Not all sharks will attack, in fact they prefer not to for most humans. I don't see you jumping to swim the sea with an open cut

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Seek help

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Ill get a life when you get basic reading comprehension and don't put words in other people's mouths because yo wanna be a little pissy baby whose feewings are huwt over something they did even say. Now fuck off misogynist

1

Anonymous #3 3w

Seek help, im not a misogynist women scare me 😂 😭

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

so no one those videos were evidence of people aborting their baby boys, just people calling out those who do support that idea... because its an awful evil idea?? plus abortion is illegal in many states now, so i really don't think it's something that is at the upmost concern. also the last video emphasized it was radfems and terfs who think that way and those aren't actual feminists who are fighting for what feminism actually stands for.

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

And you also have articles about it. https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/gender/phew-it-s-a-girl-the-stunning-decline-of-the-preference-for-having-boys-20250606-p5m5ii.html https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/is-there-a-new-global-trend-towards-having-girls-over-boys/

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

i don't think having a preference for the gender is morally wrong, but again i don't think this issue is at the upmost concern bc of how hard it is to get an abortion at least in America. Plus its also not a mew concept, people have been wanting to abort their disabled babies too, its why there r more and more test

1

Anonymous #2 3w

coming out to determine if a baby is gonna be disabled

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

i see where you're coming from but you can't listen to radfems and act like all women in world support them. again like all of your evidence was other women calling them out? clearly sane people are against that. the very notion of the idea if you have a baby boy they are automatically gonna grow up to be an oppressor is just wrong bc children need to be raised

1

Anonymous #2 3w

1. I didn’t point to feminism. I brought up man hate. 2. I didn’t say the idea was popular. I was responding to your comment (nobody thinks you’re inherently bad or awful just because you’re a man. 3. Sex-selective abortion is a big issues, it usually skews against girls, sometimes referred to as gendercide.

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Keep saying things that have nothing to do with what is actually said

1

Anonymous #3 3w

You… rn… get help please

1

Anonymous OP 3w

can yall just make out already and stop blowing up this post?? its been like three days

1

Anonymous pirosnake 3w

and i feel like man hate isn't as common as you think it is 😭 i've literally never actually met someone who hates men

1

Anonymous #2 3w

I’ve had a teacher who dabbled in it, but not THAT extreme. Unofficial grade curve based on gender, yelling, some asshole moments with students that should’ve been punished. I also know a girl that experienced the opposite. Great cook was going to be a sous chef on a cruise. Except for the fact the head chef was a grouchy old fashion German prick that said “Woman don’t belong on boats”

1