Anonymous #4 8w

^^^

2

Anonymous #6 8w

I dont know if I agree. I think someone can be tall or short and lack morals or be an asshole. You cant change your height. And someone’s weight CAN be an indicator of morals but its also either luck or discipline. You can have a fat person thats a good person/has morals, their only shortcoming is not having the discipline to change habits.

17

Anonymous #2 8w

Or poor genetics that makes it incredibly difficult to lose weight. You always forget that it’s not as simple as “lose weight” it takes discipline, yes, but it also requires luck from your parents and grandparents. To be skinny is largely up to that. Some people’s body’s healthy weight is 120, some people’s is 190, even 210. Depends on the person

12

Anonymous #8 8w

I agree Thats why I said it’s either luck OR discipline. Im skinny and mostly store fat in my hips because of genetics. I also have a fast metabolism so I eat a large amount of food. Dumb luck

7

Anonymous #2 8w

“Their only shortcoming is not having the discipline to change habits” this is the line I was addressing. Someone can have the discipline all they want and the scale won’t go down

5

Anonymous #8 8w

I also said “a fat person” so “their only shortcoming” is referring to this one individual example because its all in one sentence. Bro why are people so quick to be argumentative and nitpick jesus😭

1

Anonymous #2 8w

I’m not nitpicking, I’m just addressing what you said. Can’t have a formal discussion? You’re the one getting pressed over me acknowledging word for word your response.

5

Anonymous #8 8w

I can have a formal discussion but your only goal is to prove your take which I already agreed on. “A fat person” followed by “their” is grammatically correct as far as I know. And it means I’m talking about one specific example, one person. Not generalising for all fat people. I agreed with you but you refuse to acknowledge my point.

0

Anonymous #2 8w

You cannot have a formal discussion. I mentioned something you said, you changed what you intended. That’s it. You’re just repeating yourself over and over. Your original sentence was good, the second sentence completely negated everything prior.

5

Anonymous #2 8w

Then you got pissy and whined like a child

2

Anonymous #8 8w

Bro what?😭 The second sentence is completely valid. One fat person might not be losing weight because they lack discipline. Another fat person might not be losing weight because of genetics, stress, depression. I just gave one example. And I acknowledged thats its just dumb luck sometimes. I never changed what I intended considering I can quote myself word for word and it was said in one sentence. Thats how you use English. Excuse me if my response came of pissy.

0

Anonymous #8 8w

I js know you fat as fuck

5

Anonymous #10 8w

I was yeah, which is why I know genetics is a huge factor. Sorry I’m skinny now? Embarrassing for you to be dead wrong

1

Anonymous #8 8w

I know everyone stops talking as soon as you walk in a room

0

Anonymous #10 8w

Sure babes, you do know that… sure…

1