
Something to be aware of that I learned while interning at the help desk on campus, the longer you’ve studied in academia, the worse you are at EVERYTHING else. Spent 7 years studying rocks in academia highly likely you can’t hold a conversation with a woman or figure out how to pay your taxes or maybe how to get basic maintenance done regularly to your car. Academia is a massive island of misfit toys, unsure if it attracts those types or if it makes those types.
As someone doing a PhD, this sentiment is true in the sense that academic attracts a lot of people who are misfit and atypical, but you can totally develop life skills as long as you have a good work life balance and use opportunities like TAing and group research to improve your communication skills
It’s actually pretty bad, and so stupid. Red heads get bullied still and are assumed to be temperamental (likely originated due to the historical views of the Irish). Bleach or super light blondes are assumed to be ditzy and are sexualized. Honey blonde & dirty blonde is treated with a more girl next door attitude. Brunettes are often seen as more intelligent but stiff and somewhat boring. Black hair is sexualized and considered mysterious. Any unnatural hair color and you are “crazy”.
The stereotype isn’t that black people like chicken the same as everyone else Its that they overwhelmingly like chicken, thats where the insults come from, same as watermelon I also gave the example that of asian people and their stem abilities compared to personalities and passions…your response was also that thats a “founded accusations”
They are founded. Everyone else likes watermelon too. Those are some of the silliest things to try to craft an insult with and stick to the rule even though they are founded. People who also like chicken and watermelon overwhelmingly appear to be projecting it onto black people even though it’s founded because perhaps they aren’t at peace with how much they love chicken and watermelon themselves? The desire to project insecurities isn’t often a rational one. The rule of who projects what 1/2
2/2 does become rational once you understand how it functions. It pairs well with the social idea of “people rarely talk trash about people doing worse than them” So they see someone enjoying food they like, and they try to craft an insult out of something like “those people enjoy delicious food!” And then somehow enough people bought it that it’s some kind of human hive mind guilt about enjoying two of the most flavorful foods readily available… as absurd as it is, it’s true.
For awhile black people weren’t allowed to own large animals so they raised chickens (kinda like how they had to grow watermelon bc they could actually sell it, it didn’t need huge fields, and they wouldn’t get in legal trouble for growing it) Most of the racist stereotypes about black people stem from them being successful, creative, or just trying to exist. So it’s probably the fragility of “white superiority” that reflects on them.
So for hair, you ever notice the people who call redheads fiery do it with a bit of flame in their vibe? People who think brunettes are dull are often dull themselves? People who think blondes are sexualized (that might be founded, I blame Hollywood and the porn industry) but often either desire more attention of that flavor than others. They are all tells for personal insecurities. I know some DUMB Asians as well as smart Asians, so you will rarely ever see me perpetuating the idea.
That’s not exactly a universal thing for all races but the concept of pride being the cardinal sin does tend to blind every person who identifies primarily with their race. “People who have nothing to be proud of they’ve done as individuals tend to be proud of their race” so yeah you’re gonna have people of every race like that. White people included. You don’t often see the most successful white people waiving KKK flags nor do you see any other race sporting the equivalent if they have 1/2
this whole hair color hierarchy phrenology shit is white only bro, i'm sorry to tell you that you aren't the center of the universe. other races are aware that most hair colors other than brown and black aren't real so we don't assign personalities to them to this extent. as a black guy, i've never thought of someone as a blonde or brunette outside of the literal color of the hair and i don't even use those words because i date black women.
Yep I agree African here and hair colour hierarchy is only for white people Sure some places might praise/admire maybe blonde hair? but that’s only because its rare We dont have stereotypes or personality traits associated with different hair colours I also thought its the silliest thing in the world considering people can just dye their hair
yeah, i'm not saying that we're better than white people for not saying that hair color suggests something about someone's character because instead of doing it with hair color, we do it with skin tone. for ex., light skin men are seen as feminine and dark skin men are seen as more masculine and sexually capable. dark skin women are masculinized and seen as aggressive. light skin women are seen as stuck up. etc. of course many people don't believe that stuff though because it's nonsense.
I would be willing to bet the people who perpetuate the light skin stereotype are worried they are a bit too soft themselves. One of the toughest guys I knew when I was active duty was a light skinned guy. Won a local MMA tournament (with nationally ranked fighters) without breaking a sweat.
As a guy: 100% that totally makes sense. I was agreeing with pirosnake about the “wife material” comment. #21 made it sound like “wife material” means “oh you must be my chef and my “ball and chain””. Pirosnake was saying that’s NOT what the phrase means”wife material” means, and I agree with him. Just like how women use the phrase “husband material” to mean a good reliable life partner, that’s what men mean by “wife material”