Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
yeah having a physical requirement of any kind is discriminatory. i say that for men and women, if someome being a certain height, race, hair color is a dealbreaker for you?? that's weird af
perhaps I’m just stupid but I don’t understand why men are insecure about their height, nor do I understand why people care about height at all. Can someone please explain?
upvote 9 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

It’s not discriminatory imo, as someone who has basically no physical requirements personally. If ur not attracted to them u can’t make urself. But u also have to know how unrealistic what u want is

upvote 6 downvote
🥰
Anonymous 5w

This is just a dumb ragebait take. You are entitled to preference

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

You MUST be 4 foot, white bearded, red pointy hat, and WHIMSICAL af. GNOMES ONLY

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Is it discriminatory for me to not consider men with kids as potential romantic partners? Like a lot of the time these are just standards

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

i mean exclusively dating people who look a certain way without even getting to know them or in some cases without seeing them is discriminatory by definition. Which is weird and very superficial imo

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Sure it’s superficial, but I wouldn’t want to have someone date me if they didn’t find me attractive lol

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

like women who refuse to date men under 6ft are actively discriminating against shorter men and like no there isnt a rule against that, date whoever u want but ima judge u for that

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

and imo something like height shouldn't make a person less or more attractive

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Ofc it shouldn’t be but that’s not how it works haha

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

i'm just not content with discrimination

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

I guess we have different definitions of discrimination and arguing a definition is just gonna go in circles

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> loverboy 5w

yes preferences, but im talking abt requirements babes.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

So like you would agree men who refuse to consider obese women as romantic partners are also discriminating?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

Is it discriminatory for a man to not consider a woman as a romantic partner bc her body count is what he perceives as too high? Like lmao

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

Maybe we shouldn’t be throwing around discrimination

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

yes

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

you are the only one that is throwing around discrimination babes. these two examples don't affect the persons physical appearance which is what i'm referring too bc often times that can't be changed. however someone having a child isn't really comparable that nor is it comparable to someone having a high sexual history. one of them will directly affect the relationship as the other is just mostly irrelevant as it is in the past.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

it's a lot less understandable to tell someone "hey i like you but im not ready to be there for your kids, and i understand that comes with dating you" since you can't not be involved within that childs life. however, if you go "hey, i like you but i just don't gingers." that's just straight up disrespectful and discriminatory

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

more not less*^

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Lmao not being attracted to your partner also directly affects the relationship babes

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

yet with things like the ones i've listed don't come from a place of inherent bias?? no one is born only being attracted to people over 6 feet tall. Abraham Lincoln was extremely tall but also widely considered unattractive. Tom Holland is like 5'9 and is very much considered attractive. It's so superficial to automatically assume you won't be attracted or will be attracted to someone bc of their height.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

that’s not the point here. Not being attracted to someone isn’t discriminatory, obviously. Refusing to even consider anyone outside a specific set of preferences is, especially if this is a person you already know and like. “I’d date you if you weren’t black :(“ is discriminatory.

upvote 6 downvote
🌮
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

Oh I had a whole paragraph typed out lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5w

And I’m saying is that not the same thing as saying “I would date you if you didn’t have 10 bodies” like lmao that’s the same thing

upvote 0 downvote
🌮
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

Nah cause that’s not an immutable characteristic

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

except it isn't? like what sea taco said it's not a immutable characteristic. sexual history is something that can reflect on a person character and can be a reason for not dating somebody. it's only discrimination if it's you reject someone based on a characteristic they cannot change. height, race, eye color, etc. since that doesn't reflect their character. no one was not born having 10 bodies

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5w

imo it’s less about race being a more immutable characteristic, and more about the implications of each. Body count at least partially tells you about someone’s attitude towards sex, but I would say setting a hard ceiling there is also silly, although it’s important to consider. Race implies… basically nothing about how your relationship would go. Something like infertility or some sort of genetic disease is also an immutable characteristic, but may have more impact on your relationship.

upvote 5 downvote