
I’m not coming at this from a place of “it’s a woman’s role to take care of her children instead of working!” I just genuinely don’t understand why anyone would choose to work a 9 to 5 for a boss that doesn’t care about them instead of spending time with their kids and taking care of a home for someone who loves them. The only way I’d consider the 9 to 5 is if I had a loving family to support and return home to.
so lots of people actually are passionate about their jobs and careers AND love spending time with their families. you can very much be both and achieve both, its not one or the other. you shouldn't choose a career path that is gonna make you miserable like that. also not everyone wants kids and even if they do they might not want a lot of kids (me i want one or two) and there is such a thing as TOO much time. you and your kids both need to socialize with people their own age.
and again that's great that you don't aspire to work but again unless you have a large trust fund or rich parents or marry a women who is rich then its gonna be extremely difficult to raise your family. you shouldn't even have kids until you are well financially stable. its honestly abusive to bring a child into poverty
i’m currently a law student. i’m very passionate about the career i plan to have helping people seek justice. child rearing is beautiful but i don’t enjoy being a domestic worker. i’m a people person & i simply need more interaction than homeschooling life could provide. i also see my kids being the same way since they would y’know… be my kids & be influenced by how social i am. it’s a personal choice & we don’t need to shame people.
oh 1000%. i'm a character performer/singer at a popular theme park in florida. my whole life i've done that for free or even paid to do it. (i have a bfa is musical theatre). its what im most passionate about is being able to bring stories i'm passionate about to audiences. i'm so lucky i get do that AND get paid. i'd honestly go crazy if i didn't have any creative outlet.
But in the act of calling an ambulance, they decided to live for you, even for just a moment. That person didn’t have to save you, especially since it was your choice to put yourself in that situation. But they decided to save you from what you deserved, because they cared about you more than you care about yourself.
as someone who grew up religious, you can't apply this logic upon people who aren't also religious. and what you're saying is woefully bad advice. idk where the hell you've been and i would love to live in this utopia where everyone child and person who was born was born into a loving environment but thats just simply not true.
and also yes Jesus died for our sins because He knew we WOULD sin. its why you're able to ask for forgiveness. living for yourself is quite essential for i would say majority of people to survive. again not everyone has a loving family, or support system. being an adult is being able to depend on yourself. you can't accept someone's else love if you don't even love yourself?
The fact I didn’t read through all this nonsense & I had to go back to see this was about religion. That’s how you know someone lost the plot entirely with the point. If it’s about glorifying Jesus, don’t generalize it to be “living for other people.” Living for other people generally is bad advice.
you cleary have never been in a relationship, or know what it means to truly "live for another person" like you claim too. i love my boyfriend much but he's his own person and ik he loves me bc he shows me that in many different way. however im not going to fully depend on him for my happiness bc thats would be way too much pressure on him. you're romantic partner should be just that. a PARTNER. not someone who is responsible for your will to live.