
But if we are assuming beauty and intelligence are independent l, then it’s just as likely someone rolled a double 6 on intelligence and beauty as they are to roll a 6 on beauty and 1 on intelligence. The main fallacy is that we intuitively believe that people have a fixed number of stat points to allocate like an rpg. In reality, intelligence and beauty are positively correlated
I’m talking about the incorporation of the law of large numbers and bell curves. Intelligence and beauty itself are highly subjective so you could go down the rabbit hole of gray areas within those, but I wouldn’t call above average equating to beautiful or intelligent. Humans don’t exist like stats in a videogame but it is an accurate analogy. Genetics are a accumulation of bell curves and then you can throw in a slew of other factors like from childhood experience to emotional support to
My point with the double 6 dice roll is accounting in variable change. Each number has equal percentage of chance on the first roll and if you look at it individually then it will be equal but if you keep rolling a 6 after a 6 after a 6 after a 6 well you’re due for something else
People make this point and tbh it has no legs lol. Studying less doesn’t make you less intelligent than someone who studies a lot, for one. Two, nobody takes hours for grooming, so it’s not going to take time away from studying. Three, intelligence isn’t limited to academics. And four, school literally ends? Lmao. If you’re both out of school, what is grooming taking time away from? It’s silly
Uhm stress from anything hurts the skin. Someone stupid is often unbothered, pretty privilege puts less pressure to be high achieving and or stressed. You can study and research beyond school too. If you study like from BOOKS and study research because you genuinely want to learn, it can be stressful to wrestle with complex problems in different subjects. I dont agree with this take but you asked, this is likely the reasoning behind the stereotype before it rolled bigger.
Basically, the idea is that if you are extremely attractive, which is a lot lower of a bar for women than men, on average there’s a lot more opportunity to just have everything handed to you, and that becoming smart past basic life skills is more of a choice than for someone who is not attractive and has zero opportunity to have anything handed to them. It is more about like averages due to life circumstance. Inference
Booksmarts tend to have nothing really to do with appearance more to do with how wealthy your parents are. I’m more talking about being like a fully flesh person with their own hopes, goals ideas based on like deep thought and such. most super attractive woman I know are very proud of having no hopes and dreams other than sitting on a yacht for as many years as they can after leaving high school and moving immediately to Florida
People who are crazy attractive are just boring ppl outside of party lifestyle there’s just nothing to them which is why you always see the people with the most charisma and attractiveness with the most fucked up mental issues cause they don’t really need to take the time to think until they absolutely are forced to