Anonymous #8 12h

I do agree though she might wanna consider her options lol

31

Anonymous #10 11h

yes. let’s create 3 lives with no money, no plan, essentially setting 3 children up for failure😍

18

Anonymous #2 11h

Literally like I’m all for knew what you was doing and shit so you gotta man up but then babies will have a terrible life most likely just abort and make better choices next time

6

Anonymous #11 11h

same like we can’t be serious here😭 ppl are pro-life until the lives are actually here

2

Anonymous #3 11h

She will be poor for the rest of her life unless she’s in a VERY well off family, and it just started 😭 not you wishing that on her

49

Anonymous #6 11h

I was waiting for this😭😭

6

Anonymous #8 11h

The real question is: can she take care of all of them emotionally/physically, and provide for their NEEDS , and be able to indulge their wants in order to bring a happy well rounded childhood.

15

Anonymous #16 11h

It just makes it feel kind of forced ykw I mean

1

Anonymous #13 11h

You do realize pushing her to have an abortion goes against the same "body autonomy" philosophy as pro-lifers, right?

7

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Yessssssss!!!!!! Forcing an abortion is just as bad as forcing someone to keep the baby!!!!! Sorry I loved that you said that 😅

19

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Never said I was pro-life, I’m pro-take care of the kids you have and if you can’t take care of them you shouldn’t have them. Theres no way in hell an 18yr old is ready to take care of 3 newborns. 18 is a newborn adult 😭

11

Anonymous #5 10h

A vast majority of people don't actually care about the issues they claim to care about and that's the unfortunate truth. Whole bunch of virtue signaling.

7

Anonymous #13 10h

Listen man: I am the abortion queen. I love abortion, and I think anyone should be able to have one for any reason. The point of reproductive rights, though, is that we should always be fighting for people to make their own choices. If it’s her dream to have triplets, then hell yeah. If she doesn’t want to, then hell yeah explode those chicken thangs !!!!!!!!!! 💥💥💥💥💥💥

18

Anonymous #13 10h

I never said you were pro-life. Clearly you didn't understand my pretty clear argument which means you're likely not smart enough to even be worth arguing with.

2

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

No I understood clearly about how “making” someone have an abortion is just as wrong as disallowing it completely but there are four human lives on the line, it’s not the situation to be calling out double standards when there’s much more nuance to it than that. Obviously no one can force her to abort but we have to be realistic with ourselves. It’s downright selfish and grossly irresponsible to have one child you can’t take care of let alone three at once. Sometimes the best decisions can suck

4

Anonymous #13 10h

You don't even know the person in question or their circumstances. You're making a lot of baseless assumptions.

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

It seemed like you weren’t smart enough to work out the part where she doesn’t have to get an abortion if she doesn’t want to I just said it’s the smartest choice😭 since you went there first lmao

1

Anonymous #13 10h

It might not be the best or smartest choice. You know nothing.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

WHAT 18 year old has enough money to take care of not one but THREE newborn babies. wtv money she may or may not have probably is her parents not hers. be so fr rn. obviously the choice is hers, but from an outsider looking in this would be a terrible choice to decide on

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Unfortunately I just don’t think ur grasping how serious raising kids is, and freshly graduated college bound 18 year olds should not be attempting it

1

Anonymous #2 10h

The father could be present. His family can be well off. Maybe her parents would be willing to help. There is a lot of other factors to consider.

0

Anonymous #13 10h

It's been done before. I'm not saying she should make a specific decision, though. It's ultimately up to her and that's how it should be. Voicing your opinion on this when you know nothing is just as bad as telling someone not to get an abortion.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Even if the father stays in her life teen fathers are notorious for leaving 😭 like take as old as time man we cannot be leveraging these children’s livelihoods on a teen father

1

Anonymous #13 10h

You are just as bad as an avid pro-lifer😂

0

Anonymous #8 10h

Would you let someone have a child if you knew they couldn’t take care of it? That’s genuinely what ur endorsing right now. I’m all for reproductive rights, but I don’t have to stand with every woman especially when she decides not to get an abortion when that could be the best option for her and those kids. Not aborting is the status quo and expected of mothers by society so no I will not congratulate or support it when someone chooses to be irresponsible with children’s livelihoods

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

You don’t need to know them they got pregnant at 18 before she even got on her college campus and it was triplets obviously they can’t make good decisions by themselves let alone take care of themselves

7

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

i never said it’s never been done before, i said be realistic. carrying three children even as a more mature woman is risky asf as is. so she should risk her life, with again possibly no plan, no money for what exactly? unless she has an amazing support system which from the sounds of her brother’s opinion she doesn’t have, she’s going to struggle badly and the kids will suffer. like i said her decision at the end of the day, but i would not do that to myself

1

Anonymous #12 10h

Who going to take care of the triplets

19

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Wtv helps you sleep at night buddy ✌️

0

Anonymous #11 10h

EXACTLY!!!

4

Anonymous #11 10h

U right!!

6

Anonymous #2 10h

I never said what she should be doing. If you bothered to read anything I said, you would know that. My point is that should be what you are doing. Arguing for a specific outcome like you are now is just as bad as pushing someone to not get an abortion.

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

convinced you can’t read bc i literally said it’s still her choice…

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

i gave scientific backed facts. you’re arguing over morality, good day💀

3

Anonymous #2 10h

Your argument is using hypotheticals to emotionally manipulate someone into supporting a specific decision😂 Literally the SAME thing pro-lifers do!

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

babe google is free. carrying triplets is literally so hard on women’s bodies. go look it up before continuing to speak. my points were both scientific and personal opinion. where’s your evidence?? better yet are you even a woman?

6

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

I’m actually drawing conclusions based on this post and what I’ve seen from teen/young parents. Most people are never ready to raise kids, and teens sure as hell aren’t. Yea it’s been done before but as a parent why would you advocate to settle for less for your own flesh and blood. If the girl really cared about having a stable family she’d abort and start over when timing is appropriate. Not hard to understand what I’m saying.

1

Anonymous #2 10h

You have provided no evidence or data. No "scientific opinion" was even stated. You barely even made a claim at all. You can have an opinion, never said you couldn't. Even if you're right, you really have no right to be pushing someone to make such a drastic opinion. That is my point. You're purposefully ignoring that fact and making it out like I'm supporting a specific decision.

-1

Anonymous #13 10h

Not talking to you anymore, pipe down. You are also ignoring my point.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Your point is ignorant and stupid from lala land where everything is perfect and nothing goes wrong: AKA what you have argued isn’t grounded in reality at all 🥳

0

Anonymous #8 10h

Triplets are not pets like wtf. Just cuz u want a kid doesn’t mean u can put one out in this world and say fuck them and whatever happens to them. If ur not ready it’s the most selfish thing to have children.

8

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

i didn’t push anything i said its risky (scientific evidence) and I personally would not do it, but IT IS STILL HER CHOICE. literally stfu

0

Anonymous #13 10h

You're ignoring my argument yet again. That or you are genuinely stupid. My point is stop trying to push people into making a decision, especially through emotional manipulation based on hypotheticals. There is nuance to every situation so quit pretending it's so black and white.

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

And you have shit for brains if you think carrying three babies isn’t a major risk to life.

3

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

and you’re ignoring my point. i didn’t push anything, i gave my opinion and you think that’s pushing an agenda🤦🏾‍♀️ what part of her choice are you not understanding. you seem like the stupid one to me

5

Anonymous #2 10h

You've provided no scientific evidence. You're making that point to push a specific narrative and ultimately, a decision. That is just as bad as pro-lifers. A common pro-life argument is how abortion is hard on women's bodies and can possibly kill them as well. You're doing the same thing just flipping the script. It's hypocritical and the fact you can't grasp that is laughable. You are either purposefully ignoring my point or you lack critical thinking skills.

-1

Anonymous #13 10h

Hell yeah brother I would totally support them. If it’s someone’s dream to have a baby, they have every right to, no matter what their circumstances are. If someone outside of the pregnant person gets to decide who gives birth, then we end up with nasty stuff like fascism and eugenics. If someone’s struggling with resources for their kids, we help them. It takes a village dog!!!!

4

Anonymous #13 10h

I never said it wasn't, but it is her decision to make based on her specific circumstances. Unless you've spoken with her physician, don't generalize and claim one decision is universally the best. My point in saying that isn't to push a specific idea but rather point out a major flaw in your argument. You are making assumptions on a subject matter that takes more than assumptions.

0

Anonymous #2 10h

This person isn’t smart enough to get that I’ve learned. Getting heated enough to question intelligence over an imaginary abort/keep scenario is crazy bro✌️😭 dude will never meet those kids and they’re most likely more invested than the baby daddy. You can’t tell some ppl shit without them taking it personally.

0

Anonymous #13 10h

Nice. Reverting to insults because you know you're in the wrong😂

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

abortion is hard on women mentally, it’s hard physically when it’s done too many times. one abortion vs 4-5+ is two very different things and that’s what you aren’t grasping. abortion isn’t and shouldn’t be used as birth control

1

Anonymous #18 10h

And there’s ppl tryna act like she’ll be fine and everyone is going to jump to take care of her and the babies 😭 she on her own ain’t nobody wanna take care of other ppls kids unless you paying 🤣 and they say she won’t fuck her life up. Like she can keep them but let’s be honest about what that’ll cost her 🤷‍♀️

4

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

just say you’re pro-life💀 like i genuinely don’t understand why you can’t grasp someone saying they wouldn’t do it and why they wouldn’t do it but at the end of the day it’s her body, her choice🤦🏾‍♀️

4

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

Wait but you did that first so…

1

Anonymous #13 10h

Well her life as she knows it is automatically over and her options are limited to zero bar winning the lottery or finding a cuck to take care of another man’s kids and provide. This is common sense I’m glad you share my views gang. 🤞🤞🤞

4

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

and you keep saying there’s no evidence when it’s literally been proven that triplets hell even twins are challenging pregnancies. THAT IS THE EVIDENCE. like i said google is free. GO LOOK IT UP

1

Anonymous #2 10h

Another baseless assumption. I am not pro-life, I am pro-allowing an individual to make a decision based on their circumstances and specific facts presented to them from a doctor rather than pushing for them to make a decision based on generalizations. If her doctor says she is likely to suffer or die from giving birth, then she can, and should be allowed to, make the decision to abort them. Your point is less pro-choice than mine.

0

Anonymous #13 10h

I wasn't insulting. My point was that my argument is so easy to understand that ignoring it is more probable than actually not getting the point straight up.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 10h

there’s no way you’re sitting here saying your pro choice arguing against ppl who are actually pro choice😂 good fuck!ng bye bro like i can’t take you serious anymore

1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 9h

According to the national institute of health teen mothers are more likely to experience still births, neonatal mortality (dying soon after birth), and infant death. The likelihood also increases as the number of babies being had goes up. So yea, both her and the fetuses are at extreme health risks. I hate to be this way but you must be a man to be so sure of yourself nd so wrong at the same time about pregnancy. Here’s your facts now go argue with the scientists <333

1

Anonymous #2 9h

Where is your proof that I am not pro-choice. My entire argument is that this girl should have the right to make a decision based on her circumstances and the facts that relate to that. The main focus is that she should be able to do that without being pressured to make a specific decision based on the opinions of random people online, her sibling, or anyone that isn't a medical professional. Your argument is that she should get an abortion because triplets are hard to take care of and CAN -

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 9h

Your argument doesn’t hold up in nuanced reality though

1

Anonymous #2 9h

POSSIBLY (not for sure) cause harm to her. That is baseless assumptions and manipulating the facts of this situation to push towards a specific decision. That is NOT pro-choice😂

-1

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 9h

Yeah ngl this is all irrelevant at the end of the day we’re arguing morality and birthing kids at risk with no way of supporting them to stand on equal footing with the world is a pos thing to do and while it’s her right it doesn’t make it right does that make sense or not??!

6

Anonymous #13 9h

Again, jumping to conclusions based on nothing. I am non-binary, medically a female. What now? Also, your scientific "proof" literally uses the terminology "more likely", not "certainly". Again, pushing for a specific decision to be made based on generalizations. A pro-life generalization is that abortion is hard on women. Does that mean women shouldn't be able to get abortions? You've invalidated your own argument. Goodbye.

-1

Anonymous #2 9h

@wtvtfyournameis3000😂

1

Anonymous #2 9h

Your applying generalized facts to push a specific narrative. Literally what pro-lifers do but alright.

1

Anonymous #2 9h

It's butt fucker three thousand, address me properly.

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 9h

do you hear yourself rn😭 like this is actually giving me second-hand embarrassment. “your making a baseless accusation” when multiple doctors themselves have seen and said this🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️ but wait didn’t you just say that wasn’t scientific evidence… does that mean they aren’t doing their jobs?

0

Anonymous buttfuckerthreethousand 9h

Would you get in the car with a drunk driver even though they are only 2-4x more likely to crash and kill you? Didn’t think So. Point invalidated. XoXo

0

Anonymous #2 9h

Again, you are applying this evidence to a circumstance that you know nothing about. You are doing that to push for a specific decision. I am NOT attempting to push for a specific decision. Having triplets may or may not be what is a better choice for her medically.

1

Anonymous #13 9h

That's a false analogy. A generalized increase in medical risk isn't the same thing as knowingly riding with a drunk driver. The comparison ignores the context that a physician evaluates a specific patient's risk, not just population averages.

1

Anonymous #8 9h

I never said we should force her to abort I don’t know where that came from, but we should be honest with ourselves when we are making selfish decisions that put defenseless beings at risk. Why should I support someone’s stupid decision just because that’s what they wanted to do and now they won’t handle it responsibly?

1

Anonymous #5 9h

No, no. There is ONE option.

5

Anonymous #19 9h

Technically more than one option but for you there may be only one. She could give the babies up for adoption 🤷‍♀️ or abort them, or keep them, or mix it all together kind of thing

31

Anonymous #18 9h

Literally I’m just saying like she can keep them but it’s going to completely change everything she knows and most likely ruin any college plans for at least 6 years 😭 gonna have 3 kids nd working at McDonald’s barely scraping by which that’s just sad when it didn’t have to be that way 🤷‍♀️ but I’m evil and apparently pro life for wanting the best for a young girl just starting her life

6

Anonymous #13 9h

Yeah not to mention her children will have no good prognosis on their futures even if the government funds them as freeloaders.

1

Anonymous #11 9h

Someone who actually cares bruh. I would if I could afford kids rn

10

Anonymous #5 9h

adoption is not a solution. children suffer in foster care, most never get adopted. there is only one option

23

Anonymous #22 9h

I understand but it isn’t any of our choices. It’s the girls decision to make. Just reminding her that there are technically different ways to handle it is the only thing you should do.

33

Anonymous #13 9h

It came from the “would you ‘let’ someone have a child if you knew they couldn’t take care of it?” — the ‘let’ implies control over the decision (but all good if that wasn’t intentional.) You don’t gotta support her — hell, I totally agree that an 18 year old having triplets isn’t smart. But if she says the kids are happening, they’re gonna happen whether we like it or not. If it’s hard to support the mom, take all the support you have and show it to the kids. World’s messy, fight with love 🌎🫶

1

Anonymous #22 7h

the foster care system is not the same as adoption btw

31

Anonymous #5 5h

Ha!!!! Keep one Abort one Put one up for adoption 😂😂😂

2

Anonymous #22 4h

adoption does not equal foster care??? theres a chance they could go to a good loving family who has the financial means to support them that maybe cant have a child of their own?? you make it sound like child abandonment which its not. its a choice that expectant mothers make to try to give their child a better life than they have the means to.

1

Anonymous #11 3h

someone defintely will. but its not gonna be me in this economy. i cant even afford to live on my own yet😭 i cant imagine having to support another human being rn

1

Anonymous #22 3h

Children do suffer in foster care and many do not get adopted, but there is one caveat…babies. Babies a lot more couples want, couples can get the parents to sign over parental rights, they don’t miss any moments (can even be part of the pregnancy), and the kids have no attachment to their bio parents like many adopted parents fear with older kids.

2

Anonymous #31 3h

And what happens if the baby is born with any of the hundreds of medical issues newborns can have? No one wants to adopt a baby with costly medical problems. Abortion is such a simple answer but yall are too conservative to admit it

1

Anonymous #22 2h

I never said anything about abortion, I merely corrected a statement you said about foster care and adoption.

1

Anonymous #18 1h

If she wants them, she can have them. It’s as simple as that. It’s not a question of it being fair. For the record, I’m with you man! My opinion is that she should abort, as kids should have the resources they need to thrive! But nobody has kids un-selfishly. We are mostly brought into the world because someone wanted us, not because someone was ready. If she has all the info and chooses to keep them, she has the right to choose

1

Anonymous #2 44m

Right we should instead kill 3 children because the parents willingly did something they knew could have this outcome when they knew they couldn’t support children

-1