Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
AITA icon
AITA 1w
Popular opinion: it should be illegal to advance AI images enough that it’s impossible to differentiate from a real photo
comment

15
upvote 642 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I think it should be required for ai photos to have a visible logo or symbol that says it’s AI. Watermark. Even a button on siglas you click. If AI generators are a tool and scrapes the internet for content then we should be citing our sources. It’s just going to cause massive confusion. Same with video

upvote 39 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Was just looking up how to tell if an image is ai generated and besides the obvious there’s mostly subtle details you really have to pay attention to

upvote 33 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

why though? i’m not a fan of AI but i think it’s like trying to stop a runaway truck by standing down hill from it

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

??? Or we should just stop trying to fix the bugs that allow you to do that

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Meant this as agreement that it shouldn’t progress any more bc of how hard it is to tell currently

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Never gonna happen. It’s moving faster than you realize. Pre Covid was the perfect era, look how fast it has progressed in just a few years. The more data they have to train the better it is. Facebook/meta is collecting messenger data for ai training and announced it publicly. Good luck, it’s only going downhill from here with bipartisan support

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

??? Bc people keep using it to be creeps to women and children. And to fake celebrity drama. This isn’t rocket science

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

there’s always gonna be outliers but 95%+ all uses of generative AI are not related to that kind of task.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Literally what benefit do we get from AI pictures being indistinguishable from real pictures?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

And are said hypothetical benefits worth more violence against women and children?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

advancement in ability to create and edit. there’s a lot of use in not being trapped by the limitations of Adobe or having to pay them

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

If you can’t edit without AI then you suck lmfao. People are so lazy they refuse to even learn how to edit pictures themselves ffs. So lazy they’d rather use AI which causes harm to innocent populations and is actively killing the earth than to do it themselves. How pathetic

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

you presume a causal correlation but people were already doing heinous shit against women and children before. i can’t act like this is something new or unique when Wayfair “furniture” and Epstein are just two examples in recent memory of worse and real world consequences

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1w

Not reading that I really dgaf how you care to justify your shit morals

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

the environmental angle is so unrealistic. yes AI really does take energy and cooling, it is negligible from an environmental standpoint. if we’d start producing energy how we know to be better across the board then it wouldn’t matter at all. if anything this is spurring us to get into nuclear which is a net good

upvote 0 downvote