Anonymous #2 4w

The point for me is that a do-nothing democrat will just get us back here yk? Newsom wins, another Republican takes office after him, more irreparable damage is done, and we just backslide forever. I’m hoping low turnout or a swell in third party votes will do something to beat it into dem leadership heads that this is killing us. Or who knows maybe a real political party could replace them, but I don’t think that’s happening

13

Anonymous #4 4w

Wait really? Where have democratic congress people been using their platform to call trump a pedophile?

-1

Anonymous OP 4w

Ro kanna? AOC? Rob Garcia? Kamala Harris even criticizing Biden for not doing it sooner?

11

Anonymous #4 4w

Those are mostly Cali based but I’ve also seen so many on the news I seen leaving the place where they read the records being interviewed about what they saw and how bad it is

0

Anonymous #4 4w

To my knowledge none of those politicians have outright claimed members of the Trump admin were pedophiles, at most they’ve claimed they were protecting some nebulous unnamed predators or have made allusions to Epstein “affiliations.”

1

Anonymous #4 4w

Like I just don’t understand why the best we can hope for is criticism of the former AG or a far left democrat to allude to how bad the files are when any one of them could, at any point, read out the victim statement in the files where one victim alleged Trump shoved his fingers into a child’s genitals to “measure it” before an audience they were auctioning minors to

1

Anonymous OP 4w

They are acknowledging the wrongdoing and supporting the release and subsequent consequences of those files. I’m not going to expect any politician to outright say “_____ is a pedophile” because think of the repercussions they would face as opposed to the average person. But many have said “republicans are protecting pedophiles” and stuff along those lines. Are you looking for someone to explicitly say “____ is a pedophile?”

3

Anonymous #4 4w

Yes. They have legal right to say that based on the information in the files, and have a moral responsibility to our republic to do it.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

They could just straight up read victim statements taken from the FBI of the horrific shit trump is doing to major news outlets right now

1

Anonymous OP 4w

I agree but those are ALLEGED until they have substantial proof. Don’t mistake me for saying they are not true. I m saying there’s not enough to convict most people in the court of law. It’s enough to look bad and make people step down for reputation of their companies. But from what I have seen (watched/ read hours of stuff) idek if prince andrew could technically be brought to justice for ALL the crimes he’s done (some crime he can be charged for, but not enough for what he deserves)

4

Anonymous #4 4w

I don’t think Trump needs to be prosecuted for his crimes for dems to just straight read off the heinous shit in the files and to turn his entire base against him. Chuds aren’t going to read the files, make Trump insist on television that he hasn’t violated those kids, every time he’s asked about it he gets genuinely indignant. It’s such low hanging fruit and they just won’t pick it bc democratic leadership (Schumer, Jeffries) are traitors

3

Anonymous OP 4w

Have you even thought about what trump could do to them for coming after him? Do you not know the things he does in retaliation?

1

Anonymous #4 4w

He throws shitty little attempts to prosecute them for minor infractions and lies about them. At best I could imagine some democrats individually losing committee seats. I promise you federal congresspeople do not need to worry about stochastic terrorism with their salaries, especially if there any significant amount of democrats took a stand on this. You can’t just give up the fucking republic to a fascist takeover because the president has the bully pulpit

4