Ask Anything on Sidechat | is cuddling with someone who mutually finds you attractive and enjoys your company but no sex too much to ask for?!

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Ask Anything 2d

is cuddling with someone who mutually finds you attractive and enjoys your company but no sex too much to ask for?!

124

Anonymous 2d

Not at all??? Some of these comments are wack as hell. I don’t bone or make out with my boyfriend every time I cuddle him, tf??

Anonymous 2d

Anonymous 1d

Someone else already said it but I want to reiterate. As long as you are clear that you have no sexual intentions then it's fine. Plenty of people will be ok with that, especially if it could lead to something in the future.

Anonymous 1d

Yeahhh… cuddling may not be sexual but it’s definitely intimate

Anonymous 2d

It’s a rare find

Anonymous 2d

Yes thats toxic for one quit edging people. And two no one wants to just lay up with someone they arent tg with. give up the buns or stay to yourself

Anonymous 1d

I’d say yes, it is too much to ask for. Most likely, this will end up as one of you will harbor feelings for the other, which can make it weird. This can be the case for both guy and girl, and they might not say it as it might make things weird. Unless you both absolutely don’t want to get into a relationship and just have semi relationship benefits, then sure, it might not be too much to ask for.

Anonymous 1d

Cuddling is a very close intimate thing for sure, most people with respect and morals won’t do that without intention of commitment, so it often does lead to something.

-2

Anonymous 2d

Yes, bc then they’re going to want more than cuddling.

-6

Anonymous 2d

It’s fine as long as we makeout and I can grab that booty!!

-6

Anonymous

#1 2d

Unfortunately I am not :(

Anonymous

#3 2d

disagree! nothing toxic about it as long as you’re open with your intentions!

Anonymous

#3 2d

How tf is it toxic to want physical affection without sex….

Anonymous

#3 2d

You're weird for this

Anonymous

#3 2d

This is very telling of your character

Anonymous

#2 1d

I disagree. Just like people can be friends with benefits without catching feelings, people can cuddle without catching feelings. Intimacy doesn’t have to lead to sex nor a relationship.

Anonymous

OP 1d

You’re right, but it’s kind of hard to find people like that, that won’t catch feelings nor anything of the sort nowadays. It’s not impossible, just harder. So it’s going to take awhile to find a guy like what you want.

Anonymous

#10 1d

Hey so this is actually wrong. There is nothing in the context of philosophy of sex and love that says cuddling with someone without the intentions of a relationship is immoral. I’d understand the claim that people with self respect and morals wouldn’t have sex with someone without committing. However, I do not understand your claim nor is it valid or sound.

Anonymous

#10 1d

I think many of you are confusing something leading to sex with something leading to catching feelings. Those are two different things. You CAN cuddle with someone without it leading to sex. I don’t dispute the claim it may lead to one person catching feelings however that within itself would not lead to sex. The premise of the post is cuddling and no sex. Not cuddling and no feelings is. Idc if I catch feeling or if the other person catches feelings. That’s not the point I’m advocating for.

Anonymous

OP 1d

I never said it was immoral, I just said people who have respect and morals generally wouldn’t do something like that. It’s a lot more of a line and a lot more complicated than just “cuddling” I know people want to make it seem like it’s totally normal and platonic but it almost never is or ends that way, so I’m just saying it’s definitely not going to be a very common thing among people who hold tighter morals and respect for others feelings.

Anonymous

OP 1d

I’m not saying it will always lead to sex, but it does often lead to feelings and someone who is more respectful and considerate of that fact wouldn’t want to take that chance most likely.