
dont try to strawman my argument lol, youre applying the same concept (ruling over) to two completely different situations (conquest and slavery). Colonialization doesn’t innately come with negative connotations like slavery does. Also, the British empire, arguably the largest colonial empire to ever exist abolished slavery so
well ignoring the fact youre trying to strawman (misrepresent by saying i believe bigger and stronger countries own countries with opposite of the two) my argument and make a false equivalency fallacy (saying geopolitics is the same as interpersonal violence). Ignoring that, no i dont belong to someone bigger/stronger but someone bigger or stronger could fuck me up in a fight and kill me if im not prepared (which i do with kickboxing and judo).
never said im okay with genocide like youre a goat at this strawmanning shit😭 colonialization does not = genocide. Especially when genocide happens without colonialization. Im saying in its base form theres nothing wrong with imposing over another country if youre able. Yes this leads to death in wars (the death i was speaking about originally) but it is no different than two animals attacking each other over territory in nature.
youre speaking without any evidence lol you sound like an idiot, colonialization doesnt always lead to genocide look at the 1055 norse invasion of england or the british colonialization of india. The indigenous peoples were weak and far less advanced than the settlers, if course so many of them died lol in their culture you really fight to the end. Obviously the US committed some atrocities but so did the indigenous? such happens in war