Anonymous #2 4w

yes ok? i think the public is already asking who did what. everyone is calling for an deep investigation and prosecution after years of no justice, however i dont understand how this makes supporting trump after everything came out ok

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Notice how politicians were talking about aliens for years. From the mysterious lights in the sky that had conflicting reports being balloons to now saying they are real. Epstein files are being used in the same fashion. Disclosures occur and those involved fight it but due to interest it’s a slow rollout.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

ok yes i understand all of this and i was aware of this, still doesn’t condone supporting people in the files, im confused at your point

10

Anonymous OP 4w

So now the stuff about aliens will be disclosed but that will take time to roll it out. So what is the purpose of that? Politicians seek to create hysteria by talking about aliens and using disclosure to stop the hysteria. The Epstein files is disclosure since the beginning years ago and was considered conspiracy theory. Politicians associate with it because they want to distance from it with their narrative.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

So in the end the grand jury testimony will get disclosed and politicians will get arrested. Prince Andrews is the biggest proof of this with the monarchy ready to pivot if King Charles is exposed to say Williams didn’t know. This is why a disclosure over the years happen so that politicians and even kings basically can’t avoid what they did.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

ok cool i know all this, this genuinely has very little to do with my initial question, that’s why im confused by what you’re saying

7

Anonymous OP 4w

Watch the alien topic have a lot of parallels and disclosure will roll out all to stop mass hysteria. If one recalls or reads the chupacabra event in the mid 1990s in Mexico, politicians intend to create a world wide hysteria to get people scared. Same with the Epstein files which is why the grand jury testimony will be needed to avoid the hysteria.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

ok, sure but what does this have to do with still supporting trump after the epstein files were released, and i’m aware other people on the files are important such as prince andrew, but the president of the united states should be treated the same as anyone in this, and people should be arrested. i’m not sure what your goal in exhaling all this is

14

Anonymous OP 4w

Because details will be needed and the public will want them. It’s a catchy headline that gets people to look at the subject. It moved from conspiracy theory to a topic people find important. The next step is the actual evidence that will lead to arrests and by that time the public won’t have issue for politicians arrested. When before when it was seen as a conspiracy theory the public would take issue of arrests.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

And this is why this roll out happens overtime so that enough from the public comes to the same questions and concerns. This is really a foreign policy thing in the end to arrest enough politicians so that Congress will have new politicians elected.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Also one can read about medieval history and excommunication. A lot of it was political. The inquisition for example didn’t target witches but wealthy people of the different faiths for their land and money and it was the universities later on in the medieval eyed the witches to get religious creed. All that took time. Epstein files today serve as the excommunication of the modern day but time will pass for people in power to be exposed.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

ok so you’re going on and on but i think what you’re trying to say is that when evidence comes out people won’t be opposed to justice being served but evidence has been brought forward in the files and people still don’t care and support him so im confused at what you’re trying to say. i think you’re focusing on stuff that isn’t the question im asking.

14

Anonymous OP 4w

I do not believe a full inquisition the public will accept. To avoid that means actual proof. Without actual proof means medievalism of excommunication. There are people who take issue now and there are others who want actual evidence. In time all that converges.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

i understand that but the compiling accusations and his correlation i think it’s inappropriate to actually continue support a man like this, people can still remain republican but supporting a man so involved with epstein is inexcusable, i think if strong evidence comes out that these accusations are false then people can accept that like you are saying. people need actual proof but based on what has come out i need proof that these are false rather than anything else for ppl to support him

5

Anonymous OP 4w

Correct. His association brought the Epstein files out of conspiracy theory to a topic of concern. If this foreign policy is consistent, evidence is shown and proper evidence or the people will see its a kangaroo court. The files were hidden for many years because politicians couldn’t control the disclosure which is why it was disclosed to expose them. It’s a genie that escaped and can’t be put in the bottle. It’s either medievalism or disclosure.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

i know i’m correct, but your rant about this feels like you trying to explain something to someone who doesn’t understand this topic which i do. but i’m pretty sure you missed the point of this whole conversation and question from the start. you are simply just trying to explain and predict what will happen

11

Anonymous OP 4w

Concern is there and all it is for now is to wait for disclosure. The public will protest as they do now. Bondi didn’t want to release the files and she did but all along it was going to be released. Arrests are happening. So it’s moving forward and that’s foreign policy at work there from conspiracy theory to a real concern. There is concern for all named in the emails but real evidence will be needed.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

you literally are so far a off topic i cannot continue having this conversation

3

Anonymous OP 4w

You asked how can people still support Trump after the files. I am saying that actual proof is needed because no arrests have been made on anyone yet. Support is simply if one trusts him at all due to being mentioned in the files. By in later there is some that do not support him anymore but proof is needed either way. So the answer is proof is needed. I just added context illustrating that in history and foreign policy.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

supporting doesn’t mean trusting him in random situations u can trust his policy and nonsupport him, he isn’t just mentioned in the files too there are people just mentioned bc people went to their shows, trump is fully accused of being involved. proof isn’t needed to not support him, and the context wasn’t necessary it was a whole lot of irrelevant fluff that felt like mansplaining.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Same with Bill Clinton with the pictures of him. Also all those that went to the island. Or anyone giving money to Epstein. This cascades into an inquisition. This is why the risk of medievalism is real and why we need real proof or allowing excommunication to occur in the present day.

0

Anonymous #2 4w

i know it’s the same with bill clinton i would never support him hello? and they should investigate and all the people who gave him money or went on the island shouldn’t be supported. you’re argument is supporting everyone in the files until you feel like the proof is good enough for you?

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Enough is there to warrant real investigations. The size and scope of it will expose many in leadership from big business to politicians. That is why the disclosure is taking years because if the prosecution is done too fast along with the public not on the same page, it risks being an inquisition. It’s a sad point in history that change does take time. This is why believe this is a power play from the hard right to broker power because the disclosures go along side disclosure of benefit fraud.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

So it won’t be just the Epstein files, but also the financial fraud, the Medicare fraud, us grant fraud at the universities. All this affects the same leaders being involved in different corrupt things. One can cite the oligarchy or the political families but in the end it’s the same usurpers or society when considering history. Seems is to expose their crimes and erasing the debt that bars politicians and oligarchy from using funds to hire thugs.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

i’m honestly tired of going back and forth with you ranting about random stuff that doesn’t have to do with the question at hand. this is all great stuff, but truly it is irrelevant and i don’t need to have all this explained to me like i don’t know what’s going on in the world, thank you.

5