Anonymous #2 12w

most likely just a tax write off

1048

Anonymous #3 12w

Yeah it’s hard to feel all grateful to the ultra wealthy for giving the proportional equivalent of $5 to charity.

873

Anonymous #3 12w

That amount of money is not just a tax write off for anyone. But also who cares why they gave it? 26 million to charity is a massive net good

588

Anonymous #4 12w

I’m not telling you to kiss their boots just admit that this is a good and happy thing for the world for once instead of being so negative 😭

407

Anonymous #5 12w

…at the expense of everybody else. The only way to save the world from the brutally repressive technocracy that we are currently barreling toward head-on with no brakes would have to involve a full-tilt, full-wrap, full-force revolution from all sides. The revolution must be at once economic, social, political, ideological, cultural, educational, philosophical, and of course technological, and might already be too late. It certainly doesn’t help that we now have to face the challenge of…

20

Anonymous #5 12w

…undoing so many of the regressive setbacks that are now being forced into place by the purveyors of fascism behind and in front of the heritage foundation’s project 2025 plan and their agenda 47 mission. Everything maga and everything the current administration stands for is completely odds with not only the interests of the vast majority of the public, whether most of those people even comprehend that fact or not, but also the interests of the human race itself, as the policies enabling and…

20

Anonymous #5 12w

…encouraging the rampant and unrestricted, unregulated, indiscriminate, and out of control development and proliferation of artificial intelligence, without any kind of cohesive or comprehensive plan in place for how to protect ourselves from the plethora of both known and unknown risks and dangers that are already being predicted to present themselves in the very near or immediate future, appear to be most likely poised to sell us all out to the big tech billionaires rather than empower anybody

15

Anonymous #2 12w

shes a billionaire dude why you dickriding

188

Anonymous #7 12w

net worth is not pocket money bud most of her money is in assets and property and shit. donating 26 million isn’t a small thing and idk why we’re acting like it is. you don’t have to kiss her ass for it but 26 million does NUMBERS for charity organizations

37

Anonymous #8 12w

Oh my god sweet mommy swift giving .0000001% of her income mmm sweet mommy

-9

Anonymous #3 12w

it is a donation. donations can also be written off on your taxes. doesn’t make it less of a donation. also it’s 26 million dollars

256

Anonymous #11 12w

I don’t like Taylor, but this is a good thing. Idk why you’re upset for a 26,000,000 dollar donation. This will save thousands of human and animals lives. Like she’s not a good person but this is a shit ton of money that’s not easy for an individual to donate. Regardless of how much she makes annually, it’s still insane. Now please donate $50 million next time you want to complain about DONATING TO CHARITY. This anger you have also reduces the likelihood of other famous people donating.

49

Anonymous #14 12w

They will see the negative backlash and agree that donating is not worth it. That simple

17

Anonymous #12 12w

is it also for show if you donate to charity or are you just morally superior??

12

Anonymous #10 12w

No cause it’s not for PR purposes

-1

Anonymous haganshows 12w

It just really frustrates me when people online are so negative that they find something to complain about even for super good news. Like 26 million to charity! Can we be fucking happy for once instead of picking it apart to find anything to complain about! Jesus Christ!

189

Anonymous #12 12w

yeah because naturally when someone has the financial freedom to help other people they’re doing it for attention

8

Anonymous #14 12w

Dude, come on. A good thing. Ffs, billionaires do this all the time, charities do more for public support of billionaires (who benefit from them monetarily) than do the people the charity is supposed to help. 26 mil is a drop in the bucket. Literally. To think that will save thousands of lives is fucking CRAZY!

-2

Anonymous #14 12w

What kind of logic is that? The backlash is that they’re not giving ENOUGH money. And really, that’s money that could have been taxed and gone to public services, instead of to some shitty charity.

-4

Anonymous #3 12w

Okay but like would you rather them give the money to the government or kids with cancer? This is clearly the selfless option

101

Anonymous #5 12w

You write that all urself?

7

Anonymous #11 12w

Yes because giving money to non-profit food banks and children’s hospitals totally helps all billionaires and not the kids with cancer… dude you sound insane. Yes this can benefit these two people with tax write offs, but literally no one else other than Travis, Taylor, and the kids who will be treatment and the families getting fed

10

Anonymous #11 12w

Girl how are you this delusional? Of course 26 MILLION dollars saves thousands of lives. For example, one of the charities they donated to, “Feeding America”, reports that $1 can provide 10 meals. And 98% of their donations go directly to their services. It’s actually wild that you would RATHER the federal government have this money instead of charities that are directly feeding people 💀

16

Anonymous #5 12w

Correct. But having the bandaid is better than nothing at all. We gotta work for change without removing the slight help we have now

42

Anonymous #8 12w

She could do so much more and change the world, and it wouldn’t change her life one bit. No such thing as an ethical billionaire, there’s no way around it, that level of money hoarding only exists for greed, Taylor isn’t an exception and if anything with her lack of response to this admin using her songs, shes a billionaire she isn’t gonna say a damn thing to the man who gave her massive tax cuts. 26 million is a lot of money, but it’s not to her and this meant nothing to her. Keep her rich tho.

-3

Anonymous #11 12w

It IS this deep

6

Anonymous #14 12w

So u didn’t use ChatGPT, right?

6

Anonymous #2 12w

Key word, “can.” It can also cost dozens of dollars for one meal, considering all the miscellaneous shit they have to pay for.

-2

Anonymous #14 12w

Charities are not effective in the way you think they are. Yes, it’s great they just got some money—where’s the rest of her money going to? Why are we ok with her and her team deciding what to do with all this wealth? It’s anti-democratic and the effects of the donation are inflated.

-4

Anonymous #3 12w

I don’t think you understand how tax returns work. You still need to spend the money to donate, even if you get a deduction on your tax return. Also the write off for donations is not dollar for dollar. It’s not like she got to pay 26 million less in taxes

86

Anonymous #3 12w

You people complain over EVERYTHING! Who cares if it’s a tax write off, it goes toward HELPING PEOPLE

71

Anonymous #22 12w

i mean.. I’m sure she made just that much from forcefully taking credits from olivia

-3

Anonymous #11 12w

Go head and post those checking account statements of all your donations. I’ll wait.

14

Anonymous #11 12w

You clearly failed every finance class in high school….

14

Anonymous #21 12w

I’m an Econ major so, no, I didn’t.

5

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #21 12w

If I donated the same amount of my net worth it’d be like 20 bucks.

-2

Anonymous #11 12w

More like 200 but point still stands

-1

Anonymous #11 12w

then with 1.5k to your name yeah maybe you shouldn’t be donating over 20 dollars

8

Anonymous #10 12w

Yeah you’re probably right. Maybe I’d have more if billionaires weren’t a thing…

-2

Wow, you are wrong. She donated 26 million dollars, meaning she spent that full 26 million. It’s true that she gets a tax deduction for that donation, but shes in the 37% tax bracket meaning it’ll save her from paying about 9.6 million in her federal income taxes. So yes she gets to save a bit, but donation deductions are not dollar for dollar, and she still paid 26 million out of pocket.

91

Anonymous #11 12w

Ur fatty couch loser #1

2

Anonymous #11 12w

Many of them are highly effective. I’m not saying every single dollar will go DIRECTLY to helping someone in need, but you are underestimating how far that much money can go. And I’m not okay with it, I’m a socialist. But I don’t think this is an example of a bad thing happening

11

Anonymous #11 12w

lmao how so?? they’re gonna give you free handouts? tf

5

Anonymous #15 12w

No, I plagiarized it from a Trump speech because I’m such a huge fan of his…

5

Anonymous #11 12w

shittt don’t let them give you a degree then

15

Anonymous #5 12w

Jk. Yes. I wrote that all myself. No, I’ve never used chat gpt. What do I win?

15

Anonymous #15 12w

THIS. whyyyy would you rather this money in the hands of our government than directly to charities?? if the government had this money it would NOT go toward feeding the poor

94

Anonymous #3 12w

Why do you think donations are incentivized as tax write offs? Cuz they contribute to society lmao. I say if she’s gonna give, a tax write off is fair compensation

77

Anonymous #10 12w

You don’t realize how much a lot of “charity” money just pays the salary demands of their directors and doesn’t actually wind up in the bellies of starving children. A lot of “charities” are just conservative rackets designed to benefit the donors through tax incentives more so than the abused animals on the commercials or the starving children in the third world or whatever you think you’re donating to. The whole concept of the “foundation” is pretty twisted if you look into it. But look:

-7

I’ve been paying taxes for over a decade. I know what a write off is. Regardless of if it’s written off, that money still goes to those charities to help people. Who cares what happens with Taylor and Travis and their finances. They did a good deed. That should be the end of this discourse.

27

Anonymous #24 12w

No, it’s because then the government doesn’t have to do it because we live in a capitalist society and even making the world better is a private enterprise.

2

that is not how that works

14

Anonymous #11 12w

Money is money. I bet if you found 200 on the street you’d be giddy. Imagine the use that 200 could go to towards charity…that’s the whole point of donations.

4

Anonymous #11 12w

I just know you’re not💀 because then you would know the difference between net worth and liquid net worth

14

Anonymous #5 12w

My thing is that we have a situation where the wealthiest corporate interests have structured the whole economic system to siphon more and more money, capital, resources, wealth, etc. upward into their pockets at the expense of millions and millions of regular people. And it’s reaching the point of absurdity here when we have a jackass like Elon musk becoming a trillionaire and expecting us to congratulate him or suck his dick or whatever the fuck he wants. I don’t think the emergence of the…

0

Anonymous #2 12w

Because youre giving her what she wants. You know she didnt do this out of the goodness of her own heart right? Its for optics and looking good. If she actually cared about shit then maybe she should use her platform for good, not give the equivalent of 2 cents to charity (compared to her net worth).

1

Anonymous #5 12w

…the worlds first trillionaire is something to celebrate or congratulate or anything like that. I think it’s actually a piece of tangible evidence that the system is fucked and we are in grave danger here. The last thing we need is a trillionaire. I don’t even like the fact that we have so many people with hundreds of billions of dollars are any multibillion dollar fortunes. I don’t think we need billionaires. I really don’t. If someone can’t get by with $999,999,999.99, I think they’re sick…

11

Anonymous haganshows 12w

she’s a goddamn singer wtf do you mean “use her platform for good” she’s not an activist and she has ZERO obligation to be one just because she has a platform. millions of people throw money into her pockets because they enjoy her MUSIC. and she IS using her money for good to help people so what are you on about

28

Anonymous #5 12w

…and gross and if I thought we could somehow cap personal wealth at ONE billion dollars, I would support that. I realize a million dollars really isn’t a big deal anymore in this day and age. I also realize something that we should be talking about more as well, which is that we need to stop talking in terms of this “one percent” / “99 percent” narrative about the haves and the have nots. It’s very misleading and it alienates a lot of innocent people from supporting the cause for change…

1

Anonymous #21 12w

That’s, just not relevant here.

-2

Anonymous #11 12w

🤦🏼‍♀️ Where did you come up with 1.2974 billion?

5

Anonymous #21 12w

Google

0

Anonymous #5 12w

That’s because the top one percent is not the problem. The problem group is really the top .01 or .001%. When you criticize the entire top percent of income earners, you’re coming after a lot of people that might be your neighbors and local small business owners and people who just aren’t “balling” on a level that really compares to the real movers and shakers in the world. Making a few hundred thousand a year seems like a hell of a lot to most people, but it’s really pretty paltry compared…

6

Anonymous #5 12w

nobody is arguing with you about disliking billionaires. i think most people would agree it’s absurd to hoard that much money. that said, taylor is doing her part. could she do more? OF COURSE. but it’s unrealistic for someone to donate their entire net worth to charity and the “small” donation of 26mil does make a difference at the end of the day

15

Anonymous #5 12w

I agree with the .01% comment like I would pay a lot of money to have Jeff Bezos donate just have his money (like his ex wife did!!!)

6

Anonymous #21 12w

Half*

2

Anonymous #10 12w

You’re the first person I’ve ever seen with even a dime of common sense on a Popbase post about Taylor. I hope your pillow is cold every night and you never get stuck in traffic.

16

Anonymous #2 12w

Read more theory if you’re actually a socialist defunding this shit lol

-1

Anonymous #5 12w

…to the real sharks out there. A few hundred thousand a year salary for management professionals and business owners is nothing in the bigger picture and none of those people are gonna be billionaires anytime soon just by investing a portion of that income in stocks and bonds or whatever. The scale says it all. A million means a thousand thousands. That’s a lot of money. Don’t get me wrong. But a thousand million? Imagine that. A thousand million dollars… have you ever sat there and counted…

5

Anonymous #21 12w

🫶

8

Anonymous #5 12w

…out loud from one to one thousand before? Try it sometime. Then just ponder the notion of doing that 999 more times in a row just to count to one million. And times that by a thousand more. It’s also important to mind the distinction between measuring wealth by annual income vs by actual net worth, which is where you see that we need to be considering wealth tax, property tax, inheritance tax, and other means of reappropriating the excess accumulation of money going upward on the social ladder

2

Anonymous #10 12w

Bro I’m not even talking about Taylor swift. I give a fuck about Taylor fucking swift and her fans and her fairy tale wedding. I’m not demonizing some pop star here even if she has a billion dollars. But there’s a big difference between a billion dollars and the kind of money that the real predators are controlling. Elon musk just became a trillionaire. That’s a thousand times more money than Taylor swift is worth. And it’s ridiculous. And he needs to be checked. That shit he pulled last year…

9

Anonymous haganshows 12w

I actually don’t care why she did it. It’s 26 million to charities, that’s something to celebrate no matter who or why. Some people say true altruism is impossible because of the praise you might get for doing good things, so I feel someone’s motives don’t matter too much as long as their actions objectively improve the world. But you guys will never take a break from bitching to celebrate so have fun being miserable

14

Anonymous #5 12w

…financially sucking trump’s elderly wrinkled dick for personal access to the White House, showing up every day like a jackass in his stupid baseball caps and urban outfitters looking hipster wear, collecting all the personal info and data on the entire American population, data that was recently found to have been misappropriated and leaked to bad actors and hackers and scammers on the dark web and everything we could have easily predicted would happen to it when he put a bunch of teenage…

6

Anonymous #5 12w

thats just not the topic of conversation but if you want to talk about elon musk i 100% agree with you

12

Anonymous #5 12w

…with those firings to save an amount of money that’s only comparable to a modest fraction of his own personal wealth. What kind of a person does it take to go to work every day under public watch, wearing fashion jeans and baseball caps to the White House to pompously crusade against fraud and waste by indiscriminately firing a quarter of a million people when you’re one of the only individuals in the world who could essentially just make a few calls and whip out your checkbook to…

-1

Anonymous #5 12w

…to donate that entire sum of money to the government right on the spot, if you’re so worried about all this “waste”? What’s a bigger waste? A quarter million federal employees going to work every day to support their families (that’s where I got the “one million people” from) or one haughty, eccentric weirdo in a silly hat taking billions of dollars in corporate welfare from the government in subsidies and tax credits to line his own pockets so he can win the race to be the first trillionaire?

-1

Anonymous #4 12w

Closer to 2k for the average American

1

Anonymous #17 12w

I sure as hell ain’t spending 26 MILLION for show 💀

16

Anonymous #30 12w

Man. Tough crowd.

7

Anonymous #31 12w

Genuinely idc how much money she had total, ppl in this comment section are downplaying how much 26 Million is

21

Anonymous #17 12w

FRRRRRR. And someone said “that’s like the equivalent of someone donating $5 to something.” When in reality, MOST PEOPLE DON’T EVEN DONATE THAT!!! Donating AT ALL is pretty good and 26 million is INSANE.

10

Anonymous #31 12w

“That’s the equivalent” ok fine, whatever. We’re talking about reality and in reality 23mil is NOT the same at $5 😭

10

Anonymous #17 12w

I don’t think u understand what a tax write off is. They are doing it so they don’t have to pay as much money in taxes and ultimately pay less money over all. I.E. they are giving less money back to the community by donating money to charity. It’s why a lot of celebrities donate to charity and start non-profits. They have sophisticated accountants that are good at making sure they keep as much money as possible

-1

Anonymous #17 12w

So basically in short, it’s extremely selfish, but they can paint it as this great generous thing to ppl who don’t understand what they are doing lol, which is most Americans

-2

Anonymous #23 12w

Ok first of all I don’t think this woman is as malicious as yall make her out to be. I do think the main reason she gives to charity is bc she’s a nice lady, whether the tax thing plays into the decision or not. Second, the donation is a way of contributing too the community. And, (correct me if I’m wrong) but wouldn’t the donations she makes + the lowered taxes still amount to the equivalent of not more of the taxes she would pay normally?

6

Anonymous #30 12w

Fuck you

-3

Anonymous #28 12w

What did I even do?

6

Anonymous #23 12w

Reasons why your comments mean nothing: exhibit A. Because that money they donated went to real people who benefit from it. So I truly don’t give a rat’s ass if they are able to write it off on their taxes and I bet those who received any part of that 26mil also don’t care.

8

Anonymous #29 12w

Taylor Swift has over 2 billion dollars. The median individual American income is closer to 50,000 So no it’d be closer to $500 if we’re being strictly pedantic, but I think it’s better to focus on the fact that Taylor swift could literally donate half her net worth’s approximate value and still be richer than 99.9997% of Americans. So yeah, don’t expect me to be impressed by her donating a pittance to a good cause lmao.

2

Anonymous #10 12w

Mfs trying to argue that shes a good person for donating then yall say she has zero obligation to be a good person. Nice job contradicting yourself.

-5

Anonymous #27 12w

is net worth the same as yearly salary now

9

Anonymous #11 12w

I’m afraid Google led you astray. Taylor ALONE has more than 2 billion, and Kelce has around 100 million or so. As for what they’re doing with it. Nothing. As expected.

9

Anonymous #13 12w

No, but net worth is usually collateral to take out infinite low interest loans so it’s irrelevant - that level of wealth currently breaks the system

6

Anonymous #10 12w

You really think she’s not?

-2

Anonymous #3 12w

For what it’s worth I’ve heard from service industry workers that Taylor swift is not as miserly as most billionaires. E.g. tipping in $100 bills

12

Anonymous #39 12w

Bootlickers more like it

5

Anonymous #5 12w

a million dollars is definitely a big deal and can change people’s lives

10

Anonymous haganshows 12w

that’s not a contradiction.

12

Anonymous #4 12w

soooo surprising people are still hating on her (and not travis btw even tho they both donated….) maybe has something to do with the fact she is a she? orrr…

10

Anonymous #40 12w

Travis Kelce is worth 70 mil. Taylor swift has 23x that. Stop trying to turn this into something it’s not.

0

Anonymous #28 12w

it did say they both donated tho

7

Anonymous #4 12w

And how much do you donate?

9

Anonymous #40 12w

That is actually a very big contradiction? If she actually wanted to donate to charity because shes a good person she can drop half a billion easily and not feel it. Or 100 mil. Why doesnt she use her platform for good causes either? She only donated as a tax write off, she doesnt give a shit about being a good person, otherwise she would do something actually beneficial beyond a simple tax write off.

6

Anonymous #30 12w

You’re not negative that’s apparently what you did haha

5

Anonymous #15 12w

Correct? Why are you asking I have 3rd grade literacy skills

1

Anonymous #27 12w

okay? why the fuck would we care

2

Anonymous #11 12w

yikes god bless your future clients

7

Anonymous #10 12w

do you really think popbase, the multimillion dollar news organization doesn’t get paid to post stuff like this my marketing teams? where does their money come from then?

0

Anonymous #41 12w

About $50 a year to my church, $20 a year to the WWP, and I do blood drives twice a year. I, however, am a college student making less than $12,000 a year and not one of like the top 1,000 richest people in the world.

3

Anonymous #4 12w

I don’t think some of you guys really understand just how ludicrously wealthy Taylor Swift is, so let me put it in perspective. She could give away 90% of her wealth right now, retire, and spend 10,000 dollars PER DAY, and she would likely die before she spent all of it. It would take 60 years for her to spend 10% of her current wealth at a rate of spending $10,000 a DAY.

1

Anonymous #1 12w

Yeah. Lot of fury in these comments. Not unfounded. But quite a bit of it is misplaced, I think.

6

Anonymous #4 12w

If we take the span of her entire career (which I think is generous since she didn’t start making large amounts of money until about 15-17 years ago) she makes an average of over $300,000 dollars PER DAY. She makes the $26 million dollars she donated in less than 3 months. The whole argument about proportionality is irrelevant because Taylor Swift can comfortably lose 99% of her net worth and live absolutely comfortably, unlike the rest of us.

4

Anonymous #4 12w

I say this because people are acting like it’s unreasonable to be unimpressed at her only donating $26 million, approximately a hundredth of her total net worth to charities. She has personal wealth roughly equivalent to the GDPs of Lesotho, Eritrea, or San Marino. Countries. She has wealth equal to the total wealth of entire countries. That’s the problem guys.

-3

Anonymous #4 12w

get a job

2

Anonymous #3 12w

you people want billionaires to do this then you complain when billionaires do this

16

Anonymous #4 12w

And have you donated any money at all?

10

Anonymous #3 12w

They still have to pay for it tax write off is not a dollar for dollar savings

11

Anonymous #46 12w

You should probably read the guys comments literally right above that numb nuts

6

Anonymous #5 12w

…SUCK IT UP and pay for half the problem ourselves with all the money most of us out there DONT EVEN HAVE IN THE FIRST PLACE in order to ease the stress on the government, which means they’re basically just kowtowing to the billionaires as usual, rather than implementing any tax that would charge the beneficiaries of this inflationary bullshit some money to cover the difference and level the field a little bit for the rest of us. But ohhhn nooooo, the jet set has already been cashing out ther…

0

Anonymous #5 12w

Absolutely no one is reading all of this

9

Anonymous #3 12w

Shooting you know the in and outs their wedding can be written off too or at least 80% of it. 26 million is a lot but probably saved them so much more in taxes.

0

Anonymous #3 12w

ppl always say this like it means they have nothing, but unless they actually own the charity on the other side or get kickbacks in some manner, they only save at most 40-smth% of wtv they donate. it’s still money leaving their pockets

8

that’s absolutely not true. the top tax bracket is $731k married n $609k single, there isn’t any way they actually *save* money by donating $26M. say their income was $26.730M (assuming they’re filing jointly this upcoming yr), donating $26M would bump em down a tax bracket, so instead of paying $9.89M in taxes, they pay $262.8k in taxes and $26M in donations, so they have $26.263M leaving their pockets instead of $9.89M. Do you see how there’s actually MORE money leaving their pockets now?

5

Anonymous #52 12w

https://www.propublica.org/article/how-private-nonprofits-ultrawealthy-tax-deductions-museums-foundation-art

-1

Anonymous #5 12w

Read it. Learn it. Know it.

1

Anonymous #4 12w

did you become a massive global icon and pop star? are you, or 99.9997% of Americans, worth billions upon billions of economic activity? a lot of ppl aren’t even worth what they already get paid atm anyways

0

Anonymous #52 12w

I mean, swift is a nepo baby though. You know this, right?

0

Anonymous #4 12w

understand it just fine! just don’t care or see it as an issue

0

Anonymous #40 12w

prolly more to do with “she” being a billionaire and people hating on their kind

-1

Anonymous haganshows 12w

you keep using that as a buzzword and some sorta gotcha when it’s really not ya dumkopft, it’s still a net loss of money for her in that case. she’s not *saving* any money overall unless some shady illegal shi is going on with the charities

7

Anonymous #5 12w

the last thing i want is an inheritance tax, wealth tax, or even more property taxes it’s such a bottom feeder thing to want

1

Anonymous #4 12w

no, her NET WORTH is 2 billion dollars. That includes her music catalog and rights associated, properties/real estate, investments, and all other assets that she has. she does not have 2 billion dollars sitting in her bank accounts. Yes, she is rich, yes she is a billionaire, but it isn’t liquid and that’s a different conversation when it comes to the numbers.

8

Anonymous #52 12w

She is quite literally saving money, thats how a tax write off works.

-2

Anonymous #53 12w

Not really, because all of that shit could get liquidated if she wanted it to

-5

Anonymous #11 12w

Econ major: LOUD AND WRONG

19

Anonymous #21 12w

Econ major: loud and right.

-4

Anonymous #14 12w

That’s like me donating 1600$ that’s a lot of money. Actually that’s assuming2.6% of my wages, the real total is a lot higher. If I’d been in my career for as long as Taylor swift then it might be a 5 or 6 figure number. People keep chirping about bs

2

Anonymous #55 12w

So?

3

Anonymous #18 12w

So?

1

Anonymous #53 12w

And of that 2+ billion, roughly 1 billion is liquid. Of course liquidity has an impact. So does inflation, monetary interest, and necessary expenditures like taxes or necessities like gas/groceries. Yes, all of these theoretically would have an impact. That doesn’t detract from my point that this woman makes more in a day than most of us make in 3 or 4 years.

6

Anonymous #54 12w

Replying so to multiple comments 🤡

0

Anonymous #52 12w

No? That’s my exact point? There is a difference between someone who can lose 99% of their entire net worth, and still be richer than well over 93% of Americans and live a comfortable life) as opposed to the rest of us normal people. I have to spend approximately 30-40% of my annual revenue per year on necessities like groceries, gas, taxes, etc. To say nothing of having to pay for school.

6

Anonymous #4 12w

Taylor Swift literally owns a $54 million dollar private jet with a $3 million annual operating cost. She isn’t like us, folks, she’s so far removed from the average American that, like I said, her giving away $26 million dollars is an empty gesture. She could easily give ten times that amount, or even fifty times that amount and literally not feel it whatsoever.

4

Anonymous #3 12w

So less money she’s paying to the corrupt shit government on top of the 26 million dollar donation? Hell yeah that’s amazing

6

Anonymous #3 12w

it doesn’t really matter it’s still 26 million donated to charity

12

Anonymous #58 12w

Ignore that, the propaganda is working

1

Anonymous #59 12w

I bet if it was an independent event by a random organization that raised 26 million you wouldn’t be saying this. The only reason you’re being negative is because a celebrity donated it, and that’s a pretty disgusting bias to have. 26 million to charity is 26 million to charity fuckhead and “not caring” about it is super psychotic and fucked up. I bet you ignore homeless people and don’t give them any spare change or food

8

Anonymous #2 12w

next tell them to stop using their private jet and to stop exploiting the working class labor

0

Anonymous #53 12w

there is a reason why billionaires keep that money liquid though. it's because they can get tax right offs. she can keep exploiting the labor. yk what i wanna see her do? stop investing in corporations that are destroying our planet. give her real estate to the state to develop housing for the homeless. she doesn't though. because she's selfish. like all billionaires are. her being a billionaire is a PROBLEM. BILLIONAIRES ARE THE PROBLEM

0

Anonymous haganshows 12w

barring the unrelated things, it’s not a contradiction to say she has no obligation to be a good person. and yes, she is a good person for donating money to charity. where is the contradiction you claim? it’s just two separate statements. no contradiction

5

Anonymous #15 12w

You mean like the millions they spent on a wedding… dickriding someone who doesn’t give a damn about you is crazy 😭😭😭

0

Anonymous #5 12w

What’s that got to do with Taylor donating to charity?

1

Anonymous #42 12w

She’s not pro Israel…

5

Anonymous #56 12w

Obviously, you're not an English major! Stay classy!

-1

Anonymous #43 12w

Well my future clients I’d probably put, you know, a BIT more effort into than sidechatters

-5

Anonymous #11 12w

How much effort does it really take to use Google correctly?

1

Anonymous #63 12w

I put the first thing Google gave me for net worth, can’t say that’s using it incorrectly

2