Anonymous #2 1w

Because they’re so narcissistic that they can’t help but see themselves as prophets

2439

Anonymous #2 1w

It is a widly successful ministry. Its not just about arguing politics, but more about apologetics. And Gods “vision” plan is mostly unknown to people but the success of a ministry can in some ways show if its in Gods plan or not. Idk feel free to dm me if you have questions this is a very basic view on a pretty deep topic

382

Anonymous #14 1w

like wt

-7

Anonymous #15 1w

😭😭😭

11

Anonymous #10 1w

Me when my spouse is shot dead right in front of me

-23

Because he was not a good person. Is it sad that he died? Yes. Is it sad that he lived? Also yes.

555

They are not spreading the gospel as it was intended to be spread. They are doing it by putting down people who aren’t like them. The gospel is about love and acceptance, and they preach nothing of the sort.

487

In what ways do they teach equality?? When the face of their company says he “doesn’t agree” with the fact that gay marriage is okay, their company is NOT teaching equality. When he says that he hopes a black pilot is qualified, simply because he is black, that is NOT teaching equality.

166

So you took back your message about them teaching equality? So you know that they discriminate against marginalized peoples.

106

that is literally the last thing they teach. they teach white supremacy and racism and definitely do not spread the bible how God intended it to be spread. He asked for us to spread it with love and to go out declaring the Good News; not to scream hate speech in someone’s face, call it Christianity, and then tell them they’re going to hell if they don’t immediately want to follow God.

134

Anonymous #21 1w

she wasn't even there, she found out thru social media like the rest of us 💀

146

Humility would mean that they put aside their hatred and learn to accept others. They would repent for the damage that they have caused. They would transform themselves into a reflection of the lord, and preach acceptance.

51

Anonymous #4 1w

I’m sure that made it way easier for her

-16

FUCK NO

35

i'd rather die

28

Exactly. So why do they preach against gay marriage, using their “Christian” platform? Would Jesus not want us to go forth and love one another? Not hate someone because they DO love someone?

63

Also, him saying he would hope the black pilot were qualified is racist. It doesnt matter if affirmative action does or does not exist, a pilot is hired based on their skill. Who gives a shit if they’re black? His comments about black people in general are abhorrent.

56

Anonymous #11 1w

They don’t hate the people, they hate the behavior because it is sin as laid out in the Bible. In a biblical worldview, sin deceives people and leads to death so it would be unloving for them not to tell them or to advocate for it

31

Idkkk maybe when he described black people in the suburbs as “prowling blacks” who target white people? When he said that he doesn’t like empathy? That certainly promotes apathy and hatred. Maybe when he said that black people were “better” under jim crow laws?

49

Anonymous #1 1w

He’s probably pissed he’s not

32

DEI assures that people of color and people who are marginalized get a fair chance, and so that workplaces don’t become homogeneous in sex and race. It is not to overlook white and cishet people.

69

Anonymous #11 1w

When did he say that? Dm a link and i will reconsider if he actually said that and it’s not taken out of context

-20

Anonymous #10 1w

He don't gaf, bro focused on Epsteinizing the White House

43

Anonymous #24 1w

Dude. How can you take “They were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad. It was evil. But what happened? Something changed. They committed less crimes." Out of context? This was in a jubilee “surrounded” video. Just because he said that the laws were evil doesn’t mean this statement isnt still incredibly racist.

37

Killing myself before this happens

11

Anonymous #11 1w

probably happy tbh, same energy as that "your mom when she hears a ******* in the basement meme"

22

damn y this getting so many downvotes wtf

-4

For what reason exactly 😭 girl started talking like 5 minutes ago

4

Anonymous #6 1w

Bro you already said she was gonna tell women to submit, you KNOW the reason

20

Anonymous #4 1w

My bad, me when I'm watching my spouse online and his neck fucking explodes

110

Anonymous #11 1w

I think the problem is that a lot of his words are being taken out of context and the logical reasoning that is present in his arguments is completely discarded. These seem like racist and inflammatory statements when taken out of context which makes it easy to hate him and call him racist or whatever. But I’ve looked at the clips inside the context and they tell a completely different story, he’s not racist at all, you are just missing the context. But most people like to ignore that so they ha

-11

Anonymous #31 1w

have someone to keep hating

6

Anonymous #11 1w

What the hell is wrong with you

19

Anonymous #31 1w

Nuffin :)

22

Anonymous #1 1w

Yeah you’re right, I just think it’s crazy she spoke publicly for like 20 mins and they’re already touting a campaign for her

2

Anonymous #11 1w

that stuff is so traumatic that a lot of spouses have to go on meds for a bit to cope, which can contribute to a lack of tears. also everyone copes differently, so just because you would be sobbing, doesn’t mean that she is ready for that step right now

41

Anonymous #6 1w

Oh I thought you were responding to 11 actually. But yeah as soon as I saw this video and Ben's response I could tell their game plan

1

Anonymous #31 1w

They’re still bad with context. I think you’re just not as anti racism as you think you are

91

Anonymous #2 1w

I thought they got worse with context tbh

63

Anonymous #1 1w

I’m tired of people using DEI as some sort of racism excuse

78

Anonymous #2 1w

How are they bad with context? Explain please

-14

Anonymous #31 1w

Bruv he was just straight up racist and used buzzwords to keep it on the dl, idk how else to explain it

52

Anonymous #1 1w

Im asking for concrete evidence, give me a link or something. Because when people make this claim they usually dont know what they are talking about and just parroting what theyve heard from others they agree with

-10

Anonymous #11 1w

His point was that since the 1950s (when there were Jim Crow laws), black Americans have gotten worse off economically, which shouldn’t make sense. He claims it’s because 75% of black youth grow up without a father, which leads to more black crime, specifically homicides. When he says “they were better,” he means they committed less crimes and were better off economically in general than they are now. how is that racist?

37

Anonymous #17 1w

“If the world hates you, know that it hated me first”

-7

Anonymous #11 1w

Just because her husband dies doesn’t mean she will be sobbing every single second of everyday

34

Anonymous #11 1w

Dawg if u r trying to imply that the Bible teaches acceptance of stuff like gay marriage maybe try reading the TLDR lol

-16

Anonymous #38 1w

The Bible teaches us to love everyone regardless of race or sexuality

52

Anonymous #38 1w

So it’s love thy neighbor unless thy neighbor is gay?

47

Anonymous #38 1w

A main part of the Bible is you have no right to judge someone else. The only person who can judge is god himself and to judge someone is a sin

68

Anonymous #31 1w

Of course it does and no one is denying that, but love does not always mean tolerance or acceptance.

-2

Anonymous #24 1w

everyone knows thats not what he meant by that lmao

-1

Anonymous #37 1w

No, you should love everyone. The Bible condemns gay marriage as a sin, but says you should love others and not condemn them no matter what type of sin they are in.

-3

Anonymous #31 1w

Where in the bible does it mention gay marriage?

13

Anonymous #3 1w

Seems I misread the original comment lmao youre right

1

Anonymous #24 1w

This man literally said the civil rights act was a mistake and MLK was a “bad person” be so fr rn LMAO

40

Anonymous #37 1w

No ofc not. Love thy neighbor, but gay marriage and gay sexual activities is a sin. It’s not a sin to have those desires tho, everyone has their own cross to bear and my heart is with all people who experience those temptations

2

Anonymous #38 1w

You’re all so off topic. Idgaf, Charlie Kirk is still an asshole

23

Anonymous #38 1w

The bible only mentions unhealthy, pedophilic, abusive homosexuality. We have no measure to see if healthy, loving homosexuality is a sin. Because it only ever mentions awful relationships. It also never says anything about gay marriage itself in the bible.

27

Anonymous #15 1w

Very true. I don’t judge anyone who is in a state of sin from that. However it is not a sin to say something is a sin. It’s no different than saying bearing false witness or stealing is a sin.

-3

Anonymous #37 1w

She’s worse than her

15

Anonymous #39 1w

Nobody believes that get that shit out of here

4

Anonymous #31 1w

i mean thats what conservative right wingers thing

18

Anonymous #40 1w

Most of them dont, you are mistaken

4

Anonymous #38 1w

but arent bearing false witness and stealing commandments?? I think those r much more self explanatory than anything else u ppl decide is a “sin” based on ur own interpretations.

10

Anonymous #3 1w

When did he say those things and what was the context?

6

Anonymous #11 1w

It’s very clear in Genesis that God’s intention is for marriage to be a joining of a man and a woman together. Paul talks about homosexuality in his letters

8

Anonymous #24 1w

But I’m not going to judge anyone and that’s between them and God

6

Anonymous #30 1w

Racist piece of shit

25

Anonymous #2 1w

because it’s the modern Hitler youth group.

8

Anonymous #24 1w

Charlie Kirk said gun deaths were worth having the second amendment, he is no Christian

48

Anonymous #31 1w

Many of them do unfortunately, people have been radicalized

10

Anonymous #31 1w

This is literally in the Bible, their favorite thing to quote

4

Anonymous #15 1w

Get in the kitchen Erika!

11

Anonymous #11 1w

No it doesn’t it explicitly talks of anyone practicing homosexuality in multiple passages in both the old and new testaments.

10

Anonymous #16 1w

Not really cults get really successful too. I

1

Anonymous #11 1w

Wild

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

That’s why it’s important in addition to God’s word to have a church guided by the Holy Spirit, because having a holy book like the Bible means nothing if anyone just chooses what they want their own takeaways to be. Don’t get me wrong reading the Bible for yourself is great, but it needs to be properly directed and guided so you don’t lead yourself astray with misinterpretations or your own biases.

3

Anonymous #24 1w

I sympathize with her but I don’t like that the way she decided to cope is to declare war on every person in America who wants affordable healthcare and a basic social safety net 🫩

14

Anonymous #2 1w

Because Christian faith is one of the core tenets of their message. Not rly hard to put together

5

Anonymous #21 1w

LMFAO

17

Anonymous #4 1w

Guys you're supposed to downvote me not upvote me!

14

Anonymous #42 1w

Cornball alert

19

Where is this? I can't find it anywhere

15

Anonymous #57 1w

Not caring doesn’t mean celebrating

22

Anonymous #15 1w

When did they say women can’t have jobs? They just said having a career is cool and all, but it’s important to have a balance with that and with family.

-1

Anonymous #41 1w

Yeah, I bet you look like a model

-11

Anonymous #58 1w

Liberals are always so ugly

-12

I stand corrected, good point

4

Anonymous #58 1w

I just did what an (angry) liberal could never do: admit they are wrong

-12

Anonymous #15 1w

Huh??? Me not wanting him replaced makes me racist…right……

-4

Anonymous #1 1w

That’s no different than saying that auto accidents are worth having cars. Check your logic

9

Anonymous #24 1w

Idk man that's what he said. I think that was stupid asf too

2

Anonymous #1 1w

So you think we should get rid of cars?

7

Anonymous #30 1w

Ohhh, u dont have a brain do you

24

Anonymous #24 1w

False equivalence go crazy, guns aren't a form of transportation

30

Anonymous #1 1w

I’m not talking about guns right now. You just said you thought that was stupid too

0

Anonymous #65 1w

attractive?

-5

Anonymous #58 1w

Kirk says women should prioritize getting married and starting a family over career. By his logic, she needs to raise her kids not be a CEO, and she needs to find a new husband asap. Except Kirk said women over 30 are not as attractive in the dating pool. Hopefully she’ll find a new husband and step down. It’s what Kirk would want

51

Anonymous #60 1w

yes he would

-6

Anonymous #1 1w

That would have been more in line with her and her husband’s supposed values. Women weren’t supposed to have positions of authority or speak up on issues.

1

Anonymous #32 1w

She was full glam in the studio. I don’t think she cared.

7

Anonymous #37 1w

“May your aim be as true as your heart…is…pure.”

7

Anonymous #58 1w

I think being naturally ugly is better than looking actually inhuman and still ugly from plastic surgery

16

Anonymous #60 1w

Just goes to show how little nuance the left walks with in life. You think anyone who likes Charlie Kirk=racist when he was actively speaking out against racism. People love to take his quote on being concerned about black pilots out of context. He’s letting y’all know that DEI and affirmative action is what causes people to second guess when they see someone of color at a job that they very could’ve gotten through merit but now we’ll never know because of the DEI programs. He was going AGAINST

-5

Anonymous #63 1w

“May your aim be as true as your heart is pure.” They share a striking resemblance.

10

Anonymous #30 1w

Picking people solely based off the color of their skin like we’ve been doing with DEI and affirmative action. He advocated for color blind hiring, but no, we’re just racist I guess

-4

Anonymous #30 1w

Dude that is not what DEI and affirmative action are. The whole reason why it exists is so that skin color is not a factor when hiring. Anyone who wonders if a poc is qualified for their job bc they are a poc doesn’t need DEI to exist for them to wonder that. They are racist. Also, i am pretty sure that the other person was calling charlie kirk racist, not you.

10

Anonymous #68 1w

She sounds so eerie when she says it in the movie too

6

Anonymous #11 1w

Those programs don’t practice blind hiring/ blind recruitment, or they would allow for white people to join their scholarships, internships, jobs, etc. They either don’t consider white people during recruitment of whatever it is, or don’t even allow white people to apply because it’s meant to solely give people of color an upper hand due to the trauma that their ancestors have been through. The only thing about affirmative action I’ve understood is land acknowledgments towards Native Americans

-3

Anonymous #24 1w

So I'm supposed to pivot because you did?

5

Anonymous #30 1w

It makes total sense when a marginalized group of people asks for specific reparations, but it gets to a point where we’ve done things like abolishing redlining, the civil rights movement, and the emancipation proclamation, yet it’s never enough to even out the playing field so we then stop merit based hiring just to put people of color on a pedestal in many areas when they were actually thriving much more before DEI hiring started and people began fearing their pilots capabilities

-2

Anonymous #24 1w

It’s definitely weighing the costs against the benefits. A gun was designed for nothing more than killing, very efficiently too. But cars, knives, etc have a secondary use when it comes to killing. Do i think the benefits of guns outweigh the costs? Conservatives don’t even attempt to do anything about the US’s gun problem so why should anyone do anything but accept it sucks, shrug and say “welp it happens”.

28

Anonymous #70 1w

Literally. I don't even think the solution is banning all guns but there should definitely be a move to trying to remove the excess guns from America

6

Anonymous #48 1w

literally this man would not grieve or talk abt a single one of us after we died so i’m super unsure why tf ppl keep yappin abt ts

5

Anonymous #68 1w

god forbid she wants to look put together in a message to the entire country

12

Anonymous #66 1w

So women can’t both work and raise a family? The guy I’m with rn wants me to work but I want to be a housewife

-2

Anonymous #61 1w

Fr. I want to be a housewife so bad

6

Anonymous #1 1w

it is literally not mandated there it is merely describing how one should be dedicated and work hard if one is a stay-at-home

1

Anonymous #17 1w

cakey ass crusty makeup, thin crunchy blonde hair, migrating botox

18

Anonymous #65 1w

love how you have literally no actual rebuttals to the ideology so you just go for the ad hominem jugular. You're just as bad as when conservatives do the "blue hair nose ring feminist" bit.

-2

lol I'm not even against all that but it's just unfair to stereotype someone's appearance like that, I'd hate to be caught on a bad hair day and get characterized as an inherently lazy slob

0

Me looking hot asf w my dyed hair tattoos and nose ring😛😛

3

Anonymous #1 1w

You are just plain wrong

1

hard agree on both

0

I'm a guy too but also a POC so I feel like a lot of people assume I am the offended party in all this, irl I am actually pretty right leaning and def in favor of free nonviolent speech from both sides of course I don't follow anyone's doctrine blindly I make sure it lines up with my beliefs so I think both sides can learn from each other

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Christian nationalism

4

Anonymous #58 1w

Time and time again he said that a woman should be a mother, and not to work. Time and time again he stated that women over 30 and unmarried are a problem and a “red flag” (even though he was over thirty when he got married)

11

Anonymous #16 1w

One of my professors is on your org’s “woke watchlist”. You’re not morally superior, you are closer to Iran’s “morality police”.

11

The White House pressured ABC to drop Jimmy Kimmel. They wouldn’t have fired him otherwise. Pretty convenient that you’re leaving out the president was too soft regarding what wasn’t even a joke, but just showing a full unedited Trump clip 💀🤡

4

Because we have more of them.

2

Yeah, Trump did whine a lot during his first presidency too. Thanks for reminding me.

11

Anonymous #86 1w

If u think it’s surprising or a mischaracterization that a college professor is woke than I have a bridge to sell you

3

I mean I guess you guys have just been having a lot of tantrums in general. Especially that Jan 6th one, that was pretty bad.

16

Bro tried to pivot from the violence point like we didn’t all just see him be a complete dumb ass 💀💀💀

11

Anonymous #46 1w

Worse. Definitely worse.

1

You brought up violence, so I showed data about the violence as a whole with a knock about Jan 6th, so then you only focused on Jan 6th, which is stupid because it doesn’t address the whole point. You then said nonsense about someone being in the media. I mean, with the amount of rape related lawsuits, and the fact he was a president elect no fucking shit he was in the news. Remember E. Jean Carroll? He tried to get that overturned last week and lost because of the overwhelming evidence btw.

1

“Dummy” “why are u insulting me?”🥀🥀

5

Anonymous #3 1w

LMAO 💀

1

You sound like you could identify the different colors of crayons with taste alone.

1

I mean he is racist and misogynistic but it’s more so that people are taking an issue with pretending that Kirk is a good person, because he absolutely wasn’t. He didn’t deserve to die and the majority of the left would agree, it’s more so that they aren’t surprised and don’t feel sorry for him. Also, wasn’t even a leftie that shot him lol.

4

There’s no way you’re a college student, and simultaneously weren’t able to process the meaning the of the crayon quip.

1

Except it is a confirmed by multiple family members who were interviewed, so now you’re just lying to cope 💀🤡

1

so wtf r u doing here get a life move tf on pack it up goodbye focus on that degree of urs nerd 🤓

8

So fucking what. The Minnesota shooter was a nut job and doesn't represent the right, and Tyler is clearly a nut job and doesn't represent the left. Don't make this about political parties, especially when the right is FAR more likely to jump to violence then the left

0

Google is free. Surely you gained some semblance of skills with your degree (I doubt it from the lack of intelligence in any reply you’ve made so far)

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The Minnesota killer wasn’t even right wing lol. He was a democrat who claimed that Tim Walz made him do it. If you read what he wrote nothing about that killing sounds political, it just sounds like he went on a schizophrenic break

0

Anonymous #1 1w

They actually both represent the right, which is clearly very in line with the trend in the data.

9

Anonymous #87 1w

I would wanna see where they get that data and how they come to their conclusions

0

Anonymous #53 1w

So the left is killing the left and the right is killing the right. Makes sense to me

0

Anonymous #88 1w

Fr, who is this DEI hire

8

The first one was from the DOJ website before that got deleted but I guess the White House forgot web archive exists lmao.

2

Anonymous #1 1w

https://web.archive.org/web/20250911012550/https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-nij-research-tells-us-about-domestic-terrorism

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Pretty good read. Y’all really get all shooty when you have tantrums, it’s pretty lame tbh.

4

Anonymous #1 1w

Read up on the Minnesota killer. Nothing about that sounds politically motivated. He goes on some weird paranoid rant. He genuinely just seems schizo. He also does happen to be a democrat but I rly don’t think that’s relevant to the murders. Claiming it was due to right wing extremism is just a straight up lie though

-1

Anonymous #53 1w

No but they were super right leaning so point still stands.

1

Anonymous #87 1w

See it's when you glorify the violence after trying to preach. I was on your side but making jokes on a dead man while trying to talk about how much more violent the left is, is so redundant

0

Anonymous #53 1w

It doesn't matter to me tbh. Same way Tyler being right or left doesn't matter. If you're insane enough to assassinate someone with very little power on the hierarchy, than you're a dumbass

0

Anonymous #1 1w

“Wah wah wah you joked about a racist person dying” -the political party that made doing “the Floyd” and “the Trayvon” trends. And still make memes about George Floyd to this day. Cry harder

5

“This link told me nothing”, I guess you’re just a dumbass huh?

3

First paragraph btw. Are you trying to look like an idiot? Humiliation kink maybe?

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Can't fight fire with fire buddy. If you're doing this even a smidgen to try and change these people's minds then doing a puppet show with their hero's corpse isn't a great way to get there

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Read his manifesto. It rly doesn’t sound politically motivated in any way. He just sounds fucking insane

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Yeah I can, I’m doing right tf now and it’s working great. I don’t need to respect bad people on the slightest nor do I care to. You lost the right to my patience when y’all decided it was too hard to google basic information for the sake of a shitty argument to defend a racist, misogynistic, homophobic piece of shit who’s done nothing but drag Christianity backwards and spread hate. Cry harder 👎

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Welp, good luck with that

-2

Why don’t you join reality dumbass 💀🤡

1

Anonymous #1 1w

I don’t want your luck. If there was a possibility to convert people that mentally stunted it would’ve already happened. I don’t care nor give af to respect bad people whose every breath is an insult to intelligent life, simply because that oxygen was used on them instead of elsewhere. Data and evidence was never enough, and the morals are bad too, so why tf would I opt to be nice?

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Why don’t you?

0

Anonymous #26 1w

Notice how I had actual evidence on my comment, and you’re just yapping and wasting oxygen. Pack it up 💀🤡

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Kinda true. I guess I just don't take this right left shit serious. It always ends in 10 more billion to Israel

2

Anonymous #87 1w

I’ll ask again, why don’t you join reality?

1

Yeah, it’s called data, from a reliable source. You should try it some time instead of just flapping your gums with bullshit like a dumbass 💀💀💀

0

I like how you guys asked for evidence, got it, asked for a link, got it. Completely ignored it, presented no real facts or supported data of your own, and then told him to join reality

1

Anonymous #26 1w

And I already answered. Did you hit your head? Even posted a URL to a DOJ article about it. If reliable sources ain’t enough for you’re just too stupid to even take seriously.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Sadly it really does end in more to Israel all the time. Though at least my side sends way less than theirs so that’s a tiny silver lining (we need Bernie and Zohran Mamdani and more non AIPAC paid politicians in position of power ASAP)

1

Anonymous #87 1w

I wonder what life would be like if Bernie got the presidency. Fuckkkkkkk

2

Charlie Kirk is the worst thing to happen to Christianity in my lifetime and has genuinely sent my religion backwards substantially. Please SYBAU.

9

My data is from the DOJ, igaf that you’re citing a couple instances compared or longitudinal data that INCLUDES THIS YEAR. How are you THIS DUMB? FUCK 🫩

5

Anonymous #1 1w

Life if Bernie was president.

4

Dude, that you couldn’t even finish the first sentence of my reply is genuinely baffling. Even for a Trumpie this is ridiculously dumb. wtf don’t you get about “INCLUDES THIS YEAR”. Christ give me strength my fucking goodness 🫩🥀

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Can you see why I opt not to be nice to them? I’ve had these kinds of interactions enough to know it’s not worth it because of their insane cognitive dissonance, and stupid shit like this where they can’t even finish reading whole sentences. I’d literally regret it, if I approached the interaction any differently.

3

Bro playing xbox isn’t laid out in the bible either. Is that a sin now too? Gonna stone me for playing Dead Space 2? Fucking stupid ass argument god damn.

3

This year there was a shooting at the CDC, the Minnesota lawmakers, the attack on Nancy pelosi, a white nationalist group in the Midwest targeted a Black church, setting it on fire in what they termed a "message to the left", and the Trump assassin was a Republican. These are just the ones I could find

9

“From this year” is CRAZY. Keep on setting the bar further and further back 💀.

2

That you think that’s even a gotcha is genuinely so dumb that I’m starting to view you as outright inferior to the average human being. I’m so serious. It shouldn’t be possible be that dumb. You’re trying to argue with substantial longitudinal data because you’re butthurt. It’s crybaby loser shit.

1

Have you SEEN Charlie Kirk? 💀

5

Anonymous #87 1w

Like how does it matter if it happened in the last year or last 5 years? Because it makes the absurdly larger right wing data set look slightly smaller?

6

Anonymous #87 1w

HEY MOM, the right winger is talking about human beings as superior and inferior…

1

Anonymous #1 1w

EXACTLY. And it’s on the basis of pretending the enormous differential isn’t from instances that are literally resent.

2

Anonymous #1 1w

Recent*

1

Anonymous #89 1w

I’m not a right winger at all. I just hate stupid people, and don’t have a problem dehumanizing people that are openly bigoted and support people that are such, especially if they’re stupid. It’s probably my worst quality as a human but I also don’t care.

6

You’re making it hard not to dehumanize more dude… please stop being dumb. I’m begging you 🫩🥀

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Oh shit wait I responded to the wrong person in the thread

2

Anonymous #89 1w

Got mixed up my bad 🥀

4

Who's gonna tell him

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Tell him that he’s right?

0

Anonymous #89 1w

No you read the “inferiority” part and because of the direction that usually goes in mixed up who sent it and the intended target. I openly dehumanize bigoted people, as a super left wing person because I don’t feel guilty in the slightest about it + longitudinal data on cognitive function (of actual good quality, not at all like those comparing gender and race) show lacking cognitive function to be highly linked with bigotry, especially racism.

1

Anonymous #26 1w

White nationalism is 100% a conservative ideology

2

Anonymous #89 1w

It’s actually to the point that cognitive deficiencies in childhood, are predictive of bigoted ideologies in adulthood. In other words, bigoted people are LITERALLY inferior, and so I treat them as such.

1

Except you’re opposed to substantial evidence from reliable sources. So you’re purely coping here. Which checks because you’re genuinely a dumbass and a loser.

2

So you don't think white nationalists are conservatives? Like alt right nazis and shit? Yknow "alt RIGHT"

3

Anonymous #1 1w

You could’ve ended that comment at the fourth word actually.

6

Anonymous #87 1w

Lmaooo

5

Anonymous #87 1w

I'm kind of concerned for him tho lmao. Does he not know that the racists are on his side?

2

Anonymous #1 1w

He does, and just doesn’t care. I mean it’s all over the news about the threats to HBCUs, the neo Nazis gathering because they’re upset Kirk died etc etc. If he was worried about being shoulder to shoulder with Neo Nazis and Klansman, he would’ve changed by now. Are you starting to see why Im quick to stop being nice to creatures like him?

2

“You’re not very smart” *forgets comment from under an hour ago.* I genuinely could not care less what you think. You’ve been disingenuous and moronic routinely this whole time 💀

5

Never said assassinating civilians was a good thing anywhere either btw. It’s like you’re so dumb, that God made you as ragebait for regular humans.

1

Genuine brain aids. Yeah, your examples were met with substantial longitudinal data. Because that’s outright more meaningful. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you. You’re a fucking adult bro… 🫩

6

Could you expand on that? How is it not part of the whole Christian return to our nations roots conservative movement? At the very least, how do you deal with every white nationalist group claiming to be of the right?

4

I gotta ask, do you eat gravel for the taste, or just the love of the game?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Because that's what ICE and the whole anti DEI movement is about, you know that right? It's about making sure the white majority stays a majority

2

??

5

Anonymous #1 1w

Don’t do that to yourself #1. Always ensure public shame can occur in case of dumbassery.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

In case that was vague, I’m saying don’t ever be dragged into DMs where points and evidence can be blown off. An environment that makes it not possible to do that from other people calling it out is the only way to approach.

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Yeah I gotchu. It's a weird ass thing to say lmao. "I can continue this discussion about how I'm not culpable for the white nationalists in DMs"

2

Anonymous #1 1w

Exactly + you literally saw them try to act like the evidence I posted from the FUCKING DOJ wasn’t real until you called it out. Just imagine the brain aids that would be pulled in a DM conversation 😭

4

“Talk in good faith” oh the irony 💀🫩

1

I mean I'm not really that invested in this especially since you don't seem to care much for real data. Culpable in the sense that you're fighting on the same side

4

I’ve literally been nothing but correct this whole time.

1

Anonymous #21 1w

no it’s funny!

3

Anonymous #21 1w

Checkmate liberal

65

Anonymous #2 1w

My mom has friends that got turning point USA tattoos “in honor of Charlie” 🥀🥀🥀

8

Anonymous #91 1w

Do they know that the church frowns on getting tattoos? Hypocrites and cultists

6

Anonymous #1 1w

What church are u talking about

1

Anonymous #38 1w

The one with the crosses and shit

1

Anonymous #16 1w

It’s a Money Mill for Grifters, Charlie Kirk knew that hate was going to make home stand out because of his controversy and he rose that piggy bank all the way to his grave. Look like his Hold Digging inheritor is in the same path. She has no other means, so she is trying to stay relevant and within the perimeter of those who currently have power. Reality is that Trump had Charlie Kirk assassinated so that he could deflect attention from Epstein that Charlie Kirk was shining a light on.

4

Anonymous #24 1w

So Charlie got what he was bloviating about!? Guess Trump and his enablers are doomed to Hell, no worries he’ll eventually meet Charlie Kirk there.

23

Anonymous #31 1w

Charlie did 🤷‍♀️

0

Anonymous #38 1w

Haven’t you ever stopped to wonder 𝙬𝙝𝙮 the Bible considers homosexuality a sin? Can you provide a 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣? Zoom out: the Bible is a very old book, and frankly, you don’t have any idea who wrote it. What you are doing right now is citing what is effectively an anonymous text from the distant past. This ancient text is seemingly the basis of your moral code. Does that not trouble you in the slightest?

14

Anonymous #31 1w

THEN DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH!!

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Well that could be a couple different ones

1

Anonymous #96 1w

I mean feel free to choose to be a Christian or not. I mean tbh your response shows such a lack of understanding of the history of the Bible itself that I hope you actually look into it yourself and come to believe eventually. In the mean time tho God bless and if you want to keep responding feel free to but please look up any historical background of the Bible

0

Anonymous #11 1w

That’s just not true

1

Anonymous #4 1w

No. He said she was more conservative. We need strong conservative leaders now more than ever. We need to be able to defend ourself from the violent, militant left.

-17

Anonymous #16 1w

I think we’re missing the bigger picture being that anyone’s religion has absolutely no bearing on political decision making. TPUSA keeps trying to conflate the two and that is inherently anti-American. A ministry that delves into politics is unconstitutional and borderline treasonous. So people are obviously confused as to why supporters feel moral superiority.

2

Anonymous #24 1w

So Paul was homophobic on a personal level? What does that prove? And the other person is correct the Bible never mentions a homosexual relationship founded in love, only exploitation and sexual abuse. Leviticus, sodom&gamorra, etc.. could be interpreted as a condemnation of pedophilia or rape. That interpretation is just as valid as yours

3

Anonymous #102 1w

No religion 100% does impact political decision making. Religion is the moral code you follow, it affects every decision you make

-3

Anonymous #38 1w

The only part of my argument that rests on the history of the Bible is the anonymity part, which is not an essential feature of my argument. Even if you could present a list of verified authors, all you would’ve shown is that you’re basing your moral code on an ancient text that isn’t anonymous as opposed to one that is. My overall point, which is that you’ve made the peculiar decision to justify your homophobia with an ancient text, still stands

2

Anonymous #53 1w

Embarrassing you need religion to have a moral code

8

Anonymous #15 1w

Morality doesn’t exist without religion. Every single one of your morals and ideals, the things you consider to be right or wrong, come from Abrahamic faiths. You don’t have to like that fact, but it is true. Prior to religion, “murder” wasn’t a thing. It was a part of survival. As a lion fights a lion over territory, so did man.

-11

Anonymous #99 1w

You realize that societies with law and morality developed without Abrahamic faith, right?

19

Anonymous #100 1w

Actually she really doesn’t with the grifting fundraisers and telling her children horrible lies about her father, heaven, and blueberries, which has now prompted multiple farms to start donating food to them

6

Anonymous #53 1w

You’re just exposing yourself for having no empathy intrinsically lol. Separation of church and state is baked into our founding document. It cannot effect your decision making when you’re making decisions for everyone. That opposes freedom of religion for all

14

Anonymous #87 1w

If you are letting one person derail your faith that sounds like a different issue.

-2

Anonymous #24 1w

Well not really a lot of “christians” are making false idols out of charlie kirk and donald trump, it’s very distasteful and rightfully pushes people away from the religion

6

Anonymous #24 1w

Do you think I’m Jesus or something? Your response literally implies that you think I’m in charge of all Christianity 💀😭

-1

Anonymous #104 1w

If a Christian makes an idol out of someone besides God/Jesus then that’s obviously contradicting the faith

7

Anonymous #87 1w

I have no idea how you arrived at that conclusion

4

Anonymous #24 1w

Then why aren’t you upset about the false idolization of charlie kirk and donald trump?

2

Anonymous #24 1w

You said I’m letting one man derail my faith, in response to a comment that said Charlie Kirk is taking Christianity backwards. So “your faith” in that sentence would have to mean Christianity itself. Please stop being dumb.

1

Anonymous #87 1w

Why are you letting Charlie Kirk turn you away from a faith in Jesus? That doesn’t make any sense

-1

He’s not you fucking idiot I said he’s a bad influence on Christians. I haven’t lost any faith in the slightest. HOW ARE YOU THIS DUMB?!? 🫩

8

Anonymous #87 1w

I just want to say from another Christian, I understand what you meant. I despise telling people I’m a Christian but not “THAT kind of christian” which obviously refers to the ck and dt idolizers. Conservative extremists will always try to not comprehend what you’re saying because they think it makes their argument stronger

5

Yet here you are, showing that you feel the opposite?

4

Anonymous #104 1w

I am very upset by people who claim to be Christians and then go out and worship these people, yes

3

Anonymous #24 1w

So I take it you really dislike Kirk and his fans then huh?

-1

Anonymous #24 1w

Then why are you here, saying things that go the opposite of what you’re claiming?

4

Anonymous #87 1w

You said “he has sent my religion backwards substantially.” I apologize, perhaps I misunderstood. Did you mean Christianity in general, or your faith in particular?

-1

Anonymous #24 1w

Obviously I meant Christianity in general 🫩

10

Anonymous #87 1w

I just wanna say, this is the best usage of the 🫩 emoji I’ve ever seen lmao

10

Anonymous #87 1w

No, I simply disagree with the idea that Charlie Kirk is sending Christianity backwards substantially

-3

Anonymous #24 1w

He was almost as bad for Christianity, as Candace Owens is for black people.

5

Anonymous #104 1w

How have i contradicted myself? Support does not equal idolization

-1

Anonymous #24 1w

Well here proves the comprehension thing I mentioned earlier 😂

8

Anonymous #87 1w

That wasn’t obvious, why are you so arrogant and condescending yet claim to be a follower of Christ? That is the biggest contradiction yet

-1

Anonymous #87 1w

There’s a reason why amongst the black community, there’s a huge meme of “when somebody says something racist then goes ‘but I have a black friend’ and the black friend is Candace Owens”. Candace Owens is what you’d get if Uncle Ruckus existed IRL, and was a woman instead of a man.

4

Anonymous #24 1w

Because nobody is perfect unlike Jesus.

-3

Anonymous #99 1w

I’m not religious, but I know killing someone is wrong because I have empathy for others. It’s embarrassing that you don’t have natural empathy and morals

2

Anonymous #99 1w

Prior to religion, we still had civilizations that knew murder was wrong. We were never like lions, we were always communal species that worked in packs, packs don’t kill each other

8

Anonymous #15 1w

Yall are really acting like we killed him

-1

Anonymous #104 1w

You do realize that I don’t care he died right? Like I’m not a Kirk supporter he’s a shit person. You’re responding to the wrong person here

0

Anonymous #104 1w

I’ve read all your comments and i still have no idea what you’re talking about

-1

Anonymous #15 1w

No im replying to the correct person because you’re the one spouting off about morality and murder as if we killed him or something

-1

Anonymous #87 1w

So you can just act however?

1

Anonymous #104 1w

I’m just stating that religion is not the reason we have morals. That’s fucking bullshit, if the only reason you have morals is because your religion tells you to, that means you have no true empathy, just fear of hell

4

Anonymous #15 1w

Okay? Crash out harder why don’t you 👀

-3

Anonymous #104 1w

So you have no empathy and no true morals? You only fear god? Like how can you openly admit the only thing holding you back from being a piece of shit psycho is sky daddy’s make believe book? And not your own empathy

2

Anonymous #15 1w

Lmaoooo this is fun, keep going

-4

Anonymous #104 1w

I’m done, have a shit day murderer (clearly you would be)

-2

Anonymous #15 1w

Lmao you need help fr

-3

Anonymous #104 1w

And you need empathy

-2

Anonymous #15 1w

can we stop the stupid hate train it's going nowhere

2

Anonymous #15 1w

Oh honey I have it, just funny to watch you have a little freak out over nothing😂 you gonna call me a murderer again just for laughing at you?

4

Anonymous #106 1w

She knows Candace is the real wife and she bussed down on the real tribute to him

2

Anonymous #104 1w

What I’ve really found in this thread is that most people on this app are brainwashed retarhds that haven’t actually watched an CK interactions for themselves and instead are relying on others to tell them what to think. Embarrassing.

-4

Anonymous #99 1w

Lmaoooo you saying that while relying on ck to tell you what to think is so funny!

7

Anonymous #24 1w

No, I just lack patience for stupidity 🫩

6

Anonymous #15 1w

It’s funny you say that

10

Anonymous #87 1w

Be careful bro, they’re going to call you a murderer for replying with that

8

Anonymous #87 1w

Ohhh I see, that makes it okay in Jesus’ eyes. Got it.

0

Anonymous #104 1w

He actually died from having 5x the lethal dose of vaccines in his blood, well before the bullet hit.

8

Anonymous #24 1w

Yeah and that’s a choice lol

2

Anonymous #87 1w

😂😂😂 I like you, you’re a funny guy

6

Anonymous #24 1w

We pray and work on ourselves for a reason. Now granted even Jesus lost his patience sometimes too. More importantly, why is it you’re moving to whining and being self righteous about the validity of my Christianity rather than making a point of substance? It’s stupid shit like this why I lack patience in the first place 🫩

3

Anonymous #36 1w

Because tell me if she would have gotten that job if she wasn’t charlie kirks wife

5

Anonymous #104 1w

I like you too stranger :)

4

Anonymous #109 1w

they know wt they’re doing to

1

Anonymous #109 1w

Yeah the full context just makes him sound like the dumbass he was 😂

12

Anonymous #109 1w

Sympathy is so much more detached which is exactly what Kirk was so I guess it makes sense

6

Anonymous #109 1w

Empathy: the ability to UNDERSTAND and share the feelings of another is much more useful for people who are selfish. Because it’s hard to be sympathetic until you can imagine it happening to you.

-2

Anonymous #113 1w

U clearly know nothing about Charlie bro

-3

Anonymous #119 1w

At first I thought you meant the show descendants and that made it funnier somehow

1

Anonymous #120 1w

Rules for thee but not for me is really their whole thing

14

Anonymous #30 1w

You’re a liar lmao

5

Anonymous #120 1w

Nope. You’re entirely misconstruing their message. The idea that women should be loving wife’s and mothers and prioritize family is far different from saying that women have zero value and purely exist to serve there home and can’t have any ambitions outside of that

2

Anonymous #114 1w

Bad person asf, more like 😂

1

Anonymous #30 1w

Redlining actively happens today. You’re just making shit up 💀💀💀

3

Anonymous #104 1w

Nah her

1

Anonymous #119 1w

Aw that was very nice and generous of you

1

Anonymous #104 1w

She’s a genocidal psychopath so maybe not bahah

1

Anonymous #121 1w

Nice paranoia. In no way has the government breached church of state. As of today everyone in this country has the right to practice whatever religion they want and turning point has never once advocated against that

-1

Anonymous #30 1w

I love Charlie too RIP, the whole reason why everyone commenting on this is so aggravated from the left side is because they want to divide their opinions from the right. Never accepting that everyone will always have different views and values also never taking action on what they think are the issues throughout our country!

1

Anonymous #11 1w

SYFM

0

Anonymous #53 1w

Fr, that’s his wife too of course he’d want her to continue his movement

-2

Anonymous #53 1w

Exactly, she had morals in line with what they preached and took care of family/kids now that her husband is passed of course she’s going to take over. Why is everyone surprised?

-4

Anonymous #123 1w

That wasn’t surprising, and neither was her immediately grifting with a GoFundMe despite their family’s 12 million net worth.

11

Anonymous #123 1w

Love that yall change your mind on what he stood for when it’s convenient for the narrative 😂

11

Anonymous #104 1w

When did I change my mind on what he stood for? Yall base your arguments off of assumption

-4

Anonymous #87 1w

First off those celebrity networth calculations that u find on the internet are rarely accurate and secondly networth isn’t liquid cash and funeral expenses cost liquid cash and a lot of it. Also given his high profile his funeral will likely cost far more than any normal funeral

1

Anonymous #123 1w

Weird because facts aren’t my assumption but go off I guess, you changed your mind when you decided to pretend that CK believed that women should be in power, he clearly preached about how they should be in the wife and mother position inside the house

7

Anonymous #53 1w

Beautifully said

-2

Anonymous #104 1w

Let me clear the narrative for you. Charlie Kirk preached faith, family, and for the wife to be able to take care of her children because that is a privilege. When a mother is single you lost the privilege of being able only care for your children, she has to take care of her family by continuing the work her husband started. Network doesn’t = salary.

-1

Anonymous #53 1w

Well that’s obviously their mission, because why else would an organization like that exist? And honestly I have nothing against Christianity or any religion for that matter, anyone is free to believe and be guided by whatever…idc. It is my impression however that they will continue to use Christianity and now the death of Charlie as a facade to try and implement their radical right wing ideologies.

14

Anonymous #121 1w

Their organization exists to spread both conservative and Christian values. That’s a far cry from denying ppls right to religious freedom

0

Anonymous #53 1w

We might be able to practice our own religion but it's pretty fucking obvious what the majority of people in office practice. The fact that Trump introduced the office of faith doesn't scream a massive red flag to you?

4

Anonymous #123 1w

He routinely lied about various statistics for groups he doesn’t like for a specific narrative. “Preached faith” while spreading hateful rhetoric off lies, yeah ok bud 🫩

2

Anonymous #53 1w

Yup and to radicalize the nation. and generally speaking if does happen then naturally that will conflict with and attempt to change the Laws of the nation that grants its peoples the liberties we have. People can go to church to seek and learn about god.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The majority of the country is Christian so it’s no surprise the majority of the ppl in office are. At the end of the day America and the western world as a whole, all of our values, morals, laws, and customs are shaped almost entirely from the Christian faith. It’s impossible to separate any country in the western world from its Christian roots. If the administration declared Christianity as our nations official religion it wouldn’t bother me as long as religious freedom remained intact

-2

Anonymous #53 1w

So you're fine if our "free" country is forced to bend to the "morality" of Christianity? You don't think that would impede anybody's personal freedoms of speech love or religious practice at all?

2

Anonymous #11 1w

As a Christian, I hate no one. God did make Man for woman and Woman for man. God's intent was not Man for Man and Women for Women. I don’t hate the gays, but they are living in sin just as we all are. Why would I hate some if we are on the same boat? The difference is that many Christians acknowledge that they live sinful lives, repent, and try to separate themselves from their worldly desires. If this is hate speech to you, that's wild.

0

Anonymous #53 1w

Those “values, morals and laws” can be in alignment with individuals who do not identify as a Christian’s or believe in religion. Any nation that governs its people solely based on a religion is doomed and will most definitely have oppressed people.

6

Anonymous #1 1w

I think you’re missing the part where it already bends to the morality of Christianity. That’s the reality of the genesis of the western world, it’s tied to Christianity. Western values and morals are Christian values and morals. And no I don’t think it impedes anyone’s personal freedom as everyone is still able to practice whatever religion they want

6

Anonymous #22 1w

charlie kirk was not racist please shut the fuck up and get off the internet u all are mentally ill

12

Anonymous #121 1w

Yes those things can be aligned with individuals who don’t identify as Christian’s but because the western world was shaped by Christianity and the west has over a thousand years of Christian history and Christian culture it’s inherent that anyone in the western world has those values even if they don’t consider themselves Christian due to their cultural upbringing. For example someone born and raised in another part of the world will have different values than a westerner even if both secular

4

Anonymous #121 1w

I also hard disagree with the second statement you made. It’s only within the last hundred years that countries stopped governing themselves solely based on religion. The entire history of the west is almost solely based on Christianity and the west has always been the nicest, most accepting place to live

4

Anonymous #68 1w

I don’t know about the pure heart part, but a certain someone’s aim was true indeed.

1

Anonymous #127 1w

Erik Kirk

1

Anonymous #127 1w

Don’t insult our beautiful trans sisters like that

2

Anonymous #87 1w

He didn’t like empathy, and preferred the word sympathy. From everything I’ve seen of the guy, he seemed to genuinely care about others, including those he disagreed with. It’s honestly not even about his views at this point. It’s about what he represented to people. And on the right, he represented open discourse and a willingness to engage with opposing views. It is this ideal that people feel was attacked that day, and I hope we can all agree that is an ideal we should uphold.

10

Anonymous #87 1w

The sad irony here is that the people celebrating his death are directly increasing gun and ammo sales

6

Anonymous #16 1w

Its actually a grift. Nothing more and nothing less. Simply taking advantage of gullible religious freaks

-1

Anonymous #9 1w

Spreading the gospel isn’t narcissistic, it is what we are called to do as Christian’s! Whether you chose to walk with him is simply between you and god! He loves you no matter what, all we can do is plant the seeds! Hope you have a blessed day

1

Anonymous #30 1w

Man you’re an idiot

1

Anonymous #30 1w

Just admit there are people of color who far surpass your intellect and abilities instead of blaming it on “dei” you loser

3

Anonymous #30 1w

“OH NO! My white self isn’t getting in because the university is actually forcing talented POC to get in instead of being rejected because they’re not white 😱😱”

2

Anonymous #30 1w

Literally nobody fears so called “DEI” pilots except for the idiot who think DEI let in unqualified people 🤦‍♀️

6

Anonymous #52 1w

That’s not exactly what DEI is. DEI actually harms Asians and Indians more than white people. DEI is quotas for each race so you are basically only competing against your race instead of the entire talent pool. Yes everyone need to meet a minimum standard but due to the fact that you are filling quotas the average admitted Asian student is going to have to be more qualified than the average admitted black student

4

Anonymous #53 1w

Multiple studies have proven this isn’t true You should start googling things before you leave comments

0

Anonymous #53 1w

Maybe the morality of Christianity seems bent to you because you’re associating it with politics. I don’t think the issue is society trying to change Christianity, it’s Christianity trying to change society. Western values are based on civility, democracy and human rights. They are many religious beliefs that are oppressive and do not better society

1

Anonymous #53 1w

Civilization as we know it today and it’s aligned teaching/morals from Christianity such as love thy neighbor, thou shall not kill, steal, lie, etc… I agree are belief system that allows for humans to live in peace and harmony. Yes, several societal laws of western civilization and what we as a collective have deemed right vs wrong are adopted from Christianity, however it doesn’t inherently mandates Christianity to be the law of any land. That is not the purpose of what it is to be a Christian.

0

Anonymous #53 1w

Christianity is for how you choose to live individually and treat others. As for the United States of America, it is unconstitutional to be governed by any religion. Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness baby!

0

Anonymous #11 1w

Really? Be racist to help racism. Are you for DEI in NFL and NBA?

0

Anonymous #99 1w

Real

0

Anonymous #70 1w

Do we have a mental health crisis?

1

Anonymous #66 1w

Smooth brain, she is probably not remarrying. Read the bible.

1

Anonymous #134 1w

The bible says to redeem widows via remarriage

1

Anonymous #53 1w

Western morality is not based on Christianity 😭 maybe that's what England tried to make happen by replacing the already existing societies but that shit did not stick. I don't know if you've looked around recently but the Christian "majority" is getting slimmer everywhere but the White House

1

Anonymous #52 1w

Imagine finally seeing your spouse join you in heaven and they're with some other dude, oh nah

1

Anonymous #11 1w

This! Jesus loved everyone’s which is why people followed him and believed in him so when you are so hateful, u can’t expect people to want to follow the same path as you. I mean I’m catholic, went to catholic school growing up so I still follow Jesus but we walk different paths and my path shows kindness towards the people who have different views that me

2

Anonymous #99 1w

“Militant” really.. u guys are manipulated so easy it’s actually really sad but kinda funny😭😭😭

25

Anonymous #136 1w

Maybe she will finally find that good man he was always preaching about her having

12

Anonymous #138 1w

Idk about all that…

8

Anonymous #11 1w

The Bible is against homosexuality it is a sin, but also in the Bible no one sin is greater then the other and it not my place to judge least that I be judged.

1

Anonymous #1 1w

He was an amazing man that did so much good for our country.

0

Anonymous #142 1w

He was a podcaster, stop being such a dork

6

Anonymous #104 1w

He was more than that.

-1

Anonymous #142 1w

He really wasn’t, womp womp

2

Anonymous #104 1w

The impact his death has had on the country this past week should be proof of the opposite

-1

Anonymous #104 1w

You can think what you want but your wrong

-2

Anonymous #31 1w

You guys are just insane assholes, he meant nothing 😂 he was just a lame podcaster who grifted college students

1

Anonymous #142 1w

Go join him if you think he’s so right 😂 oh wait!

1

Anonymous #104 1w

If he meant nothing that why does he bother you so much and why did he get shot and that’s just uncalled for people like you are why this country is going downhill

0

Anonymous #104 1w

He means so much to you that you decide to respond over and over again on a yikyak thread 😂

-2

Anonymous #142 1w

Because of annoying cunts like you, you’re the one who is ruining this country by trying to martyr a PODCASTER

1

Anonymous #31 1w

Yah he does mean so much to me because he did good for this country and stood for what was right

0

Anonymous #31 1w

Wow you’re so tough for saying that, you sound like a 12 year old with that retort

1

Anonymous #104 1w

Im ruining the country because I respect someone who died? Keep in mind liberals martyrd George Floyd, resulting in 30+ deaths and millions in damages. You dont think thats “ruining the country”?

1

Anonymous #142 1w

God your brain must be so smooth 😂 thanks for saying random bullshit nobody asked for?

1

Anonymous #104 1w

I’m not trying to be tough I’m trying to say what I believe is true and right just like he did

0

Anonymous #31 1w

Did you forget what you goons did on Jan 6th and are doing now? You say you hate what happened with GF but are doing the same with CK, fucking hypocrite 😂

1

Anonymous #31 1w

It doesn’t sound like you respect him and you notice how republicans aren’t setting things on fire and having protests over his unfair shooting

3

Anonymous #142 1w

What? I’m pretty sure I’m agreeing with you on this one

1

Anonymous #99 1w

Amen

-1

Anonymous #99 1w

Mind you Kirk’s killer was conservative

1

Anonymous #111 1w

r u retar ded

0

Anonymous #111 1w

No he wasnt 😂 Its been confirmed by numerous sources he was a radical leftist

1